Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 5, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
actions/setup-node action major v4 -> v5

Release Notes

actions/setup-node (actions/setup-node)

v5

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 5, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
svelte-changelog Ready Ready Preview Comment Sep 5, 2025 3:52pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated the PR checks GitHub Actions workflow to use actions/setup-node@v5 instead of v4. No other inputs or behavior changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI workflow update
\.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml
Bumped Node setup action from actions/setup-node@v4 to actions/setup-node@v5; no other modifications.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch renovate/major-github-actions

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@WarningImHack3r
Copy link
Owner

@coderabbitai can you check what the changes are in this v5 and adapt/optimize my CI to the new features?

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@WarningImHack3r I'll help you check what's new in actions/setup-node v5 and optimize your CI accordingly. Let me first research the changes and then examine your current CI configuration.

Let me also look at your current CI configuration to understand what can be optimized:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find GitHub Actions workflow files
fd -e yml -e yaml .github/workflows

# Show the contents of workflow files that use setup-node
find .github/workflows -name "*.yml" -o -name "*.yaml" | xargs grep -l "setup-node" | head -5 | xargs cat

Length of output: 5509


🌐 Web query:

actions/setup-node v5 new features changes what's new

💡 Result:

Summary of what's new in actions/setup-node v5

  • Major change: the action runtime was upgraded to use Node.js 24 (breaking — runners must support node24). [1]
  • Improved dependency caching: automatic package-manager detection for cache (npm, yarn, pnpm) and related cache enhancements. [1][3]
  • Several dependency/security upgrades (octokit, @actions/github, undici, uuid, form-data) and an actions/checkout bump. [1]
  • Misc fixes and minor enhancements documented in the v4→v5 changelog; see the release notes and README for updated inputs (node-version, cache, cache-dependency-path, registry-url, etc.). [1][2][3]

If you want, I can:

  • show the exact changelog entries and breaking-change lines, or
  • suggest a minimal workflow migration snippet for v5.

Based on my research, here are the key changes in actions/setup-node v5 and how you can optimize your CI:

Key Changes in v5:

  • Breaking: Upgraded to Node.js 24 runtime (requires runners that support node24)
  • Enhanced caching: Improved automatic package manager detection
  • Security: Updated dependencies (octokit, @actions/github, undici, etc.)

Current Configuration Analysis:

Your current CI setup is already quite good! You're using:

- name: 🧭 Setup Node
  uses: actions/setup-node@v5
  with:
    node-version: latest
    cache: pnpm

Optimization Recommendations:

Let me also check if you have any specific Node.js version requirements:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check what Node.js version is currently specified in package.json
cat package.json | jq -r '.engines.node // "not specified"'

# Check if there are any .nvmrc or other Node version files
fd -H -I '^\.nvmrc$|^\.node-version$|^package\.json$' . | head -5

Length of output: 158


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for Node.js version constraints in various files
echo "=== Checking package.json engines ==="
cat package.json | jq '.engines // {}'

echo "=== Checking for .nvmrc ==="
if [ -f .nvmrc ]; then cat .nvmrc; else echo "No .nvmrc found"; fi

echo "=== Checking pnpm version constraints ==="
cat package.json | jq -r '.packageManager // "not specified"'

Length of output: 424


Perfect! Now I have a complete picture. Here are my optimization recommendations for actions/setup-node v5:

✨ Optimization Recommendations

1. Leverage Enhanced Auto-Detection (Optional but cleaner)

Since v5 has improved automatic package manager detection, you could simplify your configuration:

- name: 🧭 Setup Node
  uses: actions/setup-node@v5
  with:
    node-version: latest
    # cache: pnpm  # Can be removed - v5 auto-detects from pnpm-lock.yaml

However, keeping cache: pnpm explicit is also fine and makes intent clearer.

2. Consider Version Pinning for Reproducibility

Since you're using node-version: latest, you get the newest Node.js features, but for better reproducibility across environments, you might consider:

- name: 🧭 Setup Node  
  uses: actions/setup-node@v5
  with:
    node-version: '22'  # or '20' - latest LTS versions
    cache: pnpm

3. Enhanced Caching Strategy (Advanced)

For even better performance, you could add cache-dependency-path for more granular caching:

- name: 🧭 Setup Node
  uses: actions/setup-node@v5
  with:
    node-version: latest
    cache: pnpm
    cache-dependency-path: pnpm-lock.yaml  # More specific cache key

4. Current Setup Assessment

Your current configuration is already excellent and well-optimized:

  • ✅ Already using v5
  • ✅ Proper caching with pnpm
  • ✅ Using latest Node.js
  • ✅ Good integration with [email protected]

🎯 My Recommendation:

Keep your current configuration! It's already taking advantage of v5's key benefits:

  • Automatic security updates from newer dependencies
  • Better caching performance
  • Node.js 24 runtime for improved performance
  • Seamless pnpm integration

The main benefit you're getting from this update is the enhanced security and performance under the hood - your configuration is already optimal for your use case.

Your CI workflow demonstrates excellent practices with the elegant permission checks and conditional logic. The v5 upgrade will provide performance and security benefits without requiring any changes to your well-structured setup.

  (\   /)
 ( ._. )
o_("   ")   *thinking carefully about optimal solutions*

🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: WarningImHack3r
PR: WarningImHack3r/svelte-changelog#56
File: src/routes/package/+layout.server.ts:28-40
Timestamp: 2025-04-25T10:58:24.062Z
Learning: WarningImHack3r prefers elegant, aesthetically pleasing solutions for performance optimizations rather than quick fixes that introduce nested async IIFEs or similar approaches that might make code harder to read.

Learnt from: WarningImHack3r
PR: WarningImHack3r/svelte-changelog#48
File: src/routes/package/[...package]/+page.server.ts:50-53
Timestamp: 2025-04-11T10:33:07.002Z
Learning: WarningImHack3r prefers to keep server-side console.log statements in the codebase as they find them useful for debugging and monitoring, even if they might clean them up later.

@WarningImHack3r
Copy link
Owner

@coderabbitai can you create committable suggestions/review this PR so I can choose to individually apply each of the modifications you recommend?

@coderabbitai

This comment was marked as duplicate.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (1)

68-75: Bug: GITHUB_OUTPUT is echoed incorrectly; outputs are never set.

Both branches write a quoted string instead of appending the key/value to $GITHUB_OUTPUT, breaking downstream if: conditions.

-          if [[ $(git diff --name-only) =~ pnpm-lock.yaml ]]; then
-            echo "changes_detected=true >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT"
-          else
-            echo "changes_detected=false >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT"
-          fi
+          if [[ $(git diff --name-only) =~ pnpm-lock.yaml ]]; then
+            echo "changes_detected=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
+          else
+            echo "changes_detected=false" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
+          fi
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (3)

59-64: Heads‑up: v5 runs on Node 24; consider pinning Node for stability.

actions/setup-node@v5 executes on Node 24 (breaking change). Verify your runners/workflows and toolchain are OK with this, and avoid node-version: latest drift by pinning to an LTS channel (e.g., lts/*) or a specific major (e.g., '22'). (newreleases.io, github.com)

Apply one of the following:

-      - name: 🧭 Setup Node
-        uses: actions/setup-node@v5
-        with:
-          node-version: latest
-          cache: pnpm
+      - name: 🧭 Setup Node
+        uses: actions/setup-node@v5
+        with:
+          node-version: 'lts/*'   # track latest LTS
+          cache: pnpm

or

-          node-version: latest
+          node-version: '22'      # pin to current LTS for reproducibility

61-64: Tighten cache keys for pnpm installs.

Add cache-dependency-path to hash the lockfile explicitly; keeps cache hits predictable (useful if you later add more lockfiles/paths). (github.com)

       with:
-          node-version: latest
-          cache: pnpm
+          node-version: latest
+          cache: pnpm
+          cache-dependency-path: pnpm-lock.yaml

56-58: Optionally pin pnpm version (or use corepack) for reproducibility.

To avoid surprise upgrades, pin pnpm (e.g., '9') or switch to corepack enable && corepack prepare [email protected] --activate. Keep as-is if you prefer latest.

-      - name: 📥 Install pnpm
-        uses: pnpm/action-setup@v4
+      - name: 📥 Install pnpm
+        uses: pnpm/action-setup@v4
+        with:
+          version: 9
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between beeb2ab and e57f2b2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (1)

60-60: LGTM: upgrade to actions/setup-node@v5.

The bump itself looks good.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update actions/setup-node action to v5 chore(deps): update actions/setup-node action to v5 - autoclosed Sep 5, 2025
@renovate renovate bot closed this Sep 5, 2025
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/major-github-actions branch September 5, 2025 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants