Do you think it is necessary to develop a compatibility layer that only partially supports v1 plugins #4190
Closed
qianlifeng
started this conversation in
Polls
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
Which plugins that are essential to you are absent in v2 but present in v1? Leave comment. By the way, the Everything plugin has been implemented (in file plugin) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Since v2 uses a plugin architecture that is incompatible with v1 for the cross-platform features , theoretically we can achieve partial compatibility by implementing a bridge plugin host, allowing some v1 plugins to run on v2 (only certain functions, some settings-related features may not be compatible). However, this could require additional months of development and testing. Therefore, I would like to survey your opinion: do you think it is necessary to develop a compatibility layer that partially supports v1 plugins? Also, which plugins that are essential to you are absent in v2 but present in v1?
20 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions