How will you handle poison pill code? #202
-
When i explains the fork situation friend, who's more of a hardware guy. He pointed out that there is a possibility desktop-dot-org might poison pill the driver code. Most likely amdgpu or intel code something like. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
We're not using the XOrg drivers, we've already forked them. The only driver for which this is even possible is Nvidia, but now, the modesetting drivers on Nvidia proprietary finally kinda works ( X11Libre/xserver#373 ). The poison should be at a lower level than the X driver, like in the EGL driver or in the kernel module, but, because it's Free Software (as in it grants the user the four essential freedoms, two of which are to modify the software, and to distribute modified versions), distros that support XLibre will simply ship a patched version with the malicious code removed, the only one actually able to do it is, again, Nvidia. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@Slatepaws Was your question answered and if so could you please hit the "Mark as answer" button on any reply? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
We're not using the XOrg drivers, we've already forked them. The only driver for which this is even possible is Nvidia, but now, the modesetting drivers on Nvidia proprietary finally kinda works ( X11Libre/xserver#373 ).
The poison should be at a lower level than the X driver, like in the EGL driver or in the kernel module, but, because it's Free Software (as in it grants the user the four essential freedoms, two of which are to modify the software, and to distribute modified versions), distros that support XLibre will simply ship a patched version with the malicious code removed, the only one actually able to do it is, again, Nvidia.