Port xorgxrdp module stack to XLibre

[HaplessIdiot]

Describe the feature

xorgxrdp gives XRDP a clean, modular backend that skips the older x11rdp and VNC setups. If we port this to X11Libre, we can get native RDP support from Windows clients (mstsc.exe) directly into Linux sessions without needing to jump through an obnoxious number of hoops.

X11Libre’s goal is to be lightweight and modern. This fits that goal. It keeps things simple, focused, and actually useful for people running headless or remote environments.

It should be implemented because

http://www.xrdp.org/ shows XRDP already works with Windows out of the box. Thats a solid real world win, especially for folks who want to remote into their home Linux box from a Windows machine without setting up a full desktop or messing with something like VNC. Less moving parts, fewer surprises.

What are the alternatives?

• Use x11rdp or a VNC backend, which is heavier and adds complexity

• Set up a full DE just to make RDP work, which goes against what X11Libre is supposed to be

These technically work, but theyre clunky. Porting xorgxrdp gives us a better option that lines up with the rest of the design.

Additional context

To make this happen, we’d need to:

• Port xrdpdev, xrdpmouse, and xrdpkeyb to X11Libre’s driver ABI
• Make sure xrdp-sesman can launch sessions reliably
• Test screen resizing, color depth, and input redirection to make sure it matches xorgxrdp’s current behavior
• Probably makes sense to keep this off to the side at first, behind a build flag or in its own branch.
  I would love to help, but I need to finish my earlier PR first I just wanted to get this idea on digital paper per say

Extra fields

• I have checked the existing issues
• I have read the Contributing Guidelines
• I'd like to work on this issue

[HaplessIdiot]

@callmetango i just noticed you changed the title is X11Libre or XLibre the correct usage for issues? I didnt notice you had changed it and thought i had made a mistake in typing it at first.

[callmetango]

No worries. There is a litte confusion whether the name of this project is "X11Libre" or "XLibre". So to clarify this: It is called "XLibre".

[callmetango]

Moving this to X11Libre 4 Good Ideas For Later · Discussions · GitHub since this functionality is not part of the direct scope of application of the XLibre Xserver, but could be considered at a later date.

[HaplessIdiot]

Yeah I put this project on hold until we decide how things go with the input and video drivers being made monolithic if it's all going to be built inside xlibre I'll need to completely redo previous work

[callmetango]

Why would you need to redo your previous work and how?