Consistency in naming

[probonopd]

Thank you very much for your effort to revitalize X11, this is very much needed.

It is so sad that a certain company wants to shove their philosophy and architecture down everyone's throat, and has been badmouthing Xorg for years. Hopefully this project will become a true community effort with plenty of contributors and no corporate influence.

I noticed some inconsistencies in the naming which would be good to get clarified before packaging starts for all the various distributions:

• Is it XLibre (as in the README) or is it X11Libre as in https://github.com/X11Libre?
• Is it Xserver or XServer (capitalization consistent with XLibre)?

[probonopd]

Looking at the press, it seems like most refer to the project as "XLibre" (not X11Libre).

[fredvs]

Hum, ok but what about this: https://github.com/X11Libre/

(Maybe ask Elon what he prefers...)

[probonopd]

Further evidence is that all known Linux distribution packages use xlibre:

• Distro with X11Libre and Xenocara vs X11Libre #1

[callmetango]

Also as in https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver/blob/master/README.md :

Mailing list: https://www.freelists.org/list/xlibre
Telegram channel: https://t.me/x11dev
Matrix room (mirror of tg group): https://matrix.to/#/#xlibre:matrix.org

[callmetango]

As a sidenote: There is already a US company called XLibre.

[callmetango]

@metux Could we please have one name and use this everywhere? This is very important for naming files, packages etc.

[callmetango]

Thank you for your contribution! We currently restructured the "Ideas" discussions and accordingly this discussion will be moved to the X11Libre 3 Ideas Soon To Be Addressed · Discussions · GitHub category.