"Concerns About IP Address Exposure When Using the 'Direct' SNI Setting in Reality Protocol"

[us254]

I am considering setting the SNI to go 'direct' in my client-side routing settings for the Reality protocol to potentially speed up connections and reduce latency. However, I am concerned about the potential exposure of my real IP address. In this context, would the IP address that gets exposed be that of my local client machine or my remote server?

in the client side config, if my SNI for reality be exmple.com

{
  "routing": {
    "domainStrategy": "IPIfNonMatch",
    "rules": [
      {
        "type": "field",
        "domain": [
          "example.com"
        ],
        "outboundTag": "direct"
      }
    ]
  }
}

[AmirHosseinCV]

It would be your remote server's IP. If you want to bypass some websites, it should be configured on the client side.