Replies: 2 comments 8 replies
-
The only major difference between the two is that seamless mode uses the composite X11 extension to capture the window contents.
Please file a separate ticket for this - if we don't have one already. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That's the same solution as running xpra in desktop mode really.
The xpra server is more likely to be relevant.
Correct. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
First: thank you a million times for having built Xpra. I was previously using x11vnc + noVNC + fluxbox, but Xpra (specially the seamless mode) is so much better!
I know this is a VERY specific ask, but I have a very old DVR which I can only operate from Internet Explorer or an old version of Firefox, on Windows.
I managed to create a docker container with everything... Xpra, Wine, Firefox ESR 31.7.0, Hikvision WebComponents...
And it works great, except that the video playback does not work in seamless mode. See:
chrome_GDnOBXrwIm.mp4
I could not find anything relevant in any logs, but if you want, I can send any logs.
I don't have many expectations to have this fixed, but maybe someone had a similar issue with some other application.
PS: the same thing works great in desktop mode:
chrome_xzsQDy1bHK.mp4
But desktop mode has many other issues, like my cursor position is not synchronized with the cursor in the desktop for some reason.
I would appreciate any help.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions