Skip to content

Conversation

@TadakiAsechi
Copy link
Contributor

What
Ensure history_length=0 results in ?historyLength=0 being sent by the REST client.

Why
0 was treated as falsy → the param was omitted → servers returned the full history.

How
Replace truthy check with explicit is not None.

Ref

Fixes #479

@TadakiAsechi TadakiAsechi requested a review from a team as a code owner September 29, 2025 10:52
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @TadakiAsechi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a critical bug in the REST client's parameter handling. Previously, when a user explicitly requested a history_length of 0, the client's logic inadvertently omitted this parameter from the outgoing request because 0 was treated as a falsy value. This resulted in the server defaulting to returning the complete history, contrary to the client's intent. The change ensures that history_length=0 is always sent, guaranteeing that the server receives and processes the request as intended, thereby preventing the unintended retrieval of full history.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Addresses an issue where history_length=0 was not correctly sent as a query parameter to the REST client, leading to servers returning the full history instead of an empty one.
  • Conditional Logic Update: The conditional check for request.history_length was updated from a truthy check (if request.history_length) to an explicit is not None check (if request.history_length is not None).
  • Parameter Handling: Ensures that history_length=0 is now properly included in the URL as ?historyLength=0, allowing the server to correctly interpret the request for zero history.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a bug where history_length=0 was being treated as a falsy value, causing the historyLength query parameter to be omitted from REST requests. The change from a truthy check to if request.history_length is not None is the right solution. I've added one minor suggestion to improve code readability.

@holtskinner holtskinner changed the title fix(rest): send historyLength=0 (avoid falsy omission) fix(rest): send historyLength=0 (avoid falsy omission) Sep 29, 2025
@holtskinner holtskinner merged commit ed28b59 into a2aproject:main Sep 29, 2025
7 checks passed
holtskinner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.3.8](v0.3.7...v0.3.8)
(2025-10-06)


### Bug Fixes

* Add `__str__` and `__repr__` methods to `ServerError`
([#489](#489))
([2c152c0](2c152c0))
* **grpc:** Fix missing extensions from protobuf
([#476](#476))
([8dbc78a](8dbc78a))
* **rest:** send `historyLength=0` (avoid falsy omission)
([#480](#480))
([ed28b59](ed28b59)),
closes [#479](#479)


### Documentation

* `a2a-sdk[all]` installation command in Readme
([#485](#485))
([6ac9a7c](6ac9a7c))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: REST get_task does not send historyLength=0, causing full history to return

2 participants