new article: AOT

Author: ebicoglu

docs/en/Community-Articles/2025-10-03-Native-AOT/Cover.png

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+# Native AOT: How to Fasten Startup Time and Memory Footprint
+
+So since .NET 8 there's been one feature that’s quietly a game-changer for performance nerds is **Native AOT** (Ahead-of-Time compilation). If you’ve ever fought with sluggish cold starts (especially in containerized or serverless environments), or dealt with memory pressure from bloated apps, Native AOT might just be your new best friend.
+
+------
+
+## What is Native AOT?
+
+Normally, .NET apps ship as IL (*Intermediate Language*) and JIT-compile at runtime. That’s flexible, but it takes longer startup time and memory. 
+Native AOT flips the script: your app gets compiled straight into a platform-specific binary *before it ever runs*.
+
+As a result;
+
+- No JIT overhead at startup.
+- Smaller memory footprint (no JIT engine or IL sitting around).
+- Faster startup (especially noticeable in microservices, functions, or CLI tools).
+
+------
+
+## Advantages of AOT
+
+- **Broader support** → More workloads and libraries now play nice witt.h AOT.
+- **Smaller output sizes** → Trimmed down runtime dependencies.
+- **Better diagnostics** → Easier to figure out why your build blew up (because yes, AOT can be picky).
+- **ASP.NET Core AOT** → Minimal APIs and gRPC services actually *benefit massively* here. Cold starts are crazy fast.
+
+------
+
+## Why you should care
+
+If you’re building:
+
+- **Serverless apps (AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, GCP Cloud Run)** → Startup time matters a LOT.
+- **Microservices** → Lightweight services scale better when they use less memory per pod.
+- **CLI tools** → No one likes waiting half a second for a tool to boot. AOT makes them feel “native” (because they literally are).
+
+And yeah, you *can* get Go-like startup performance in .NET now.
+
+------
+
+## The trade-offs (because nothing’s free)
+
+Native AOT isn’t a silver bullet:
+
+- Build times are longer (the compiler does all the heavy lifting upfront).
+- Less runtime flexibility (no reflection-based magic, dynamic codegen, or IL rewriting).
+- Debugging can be trickier.
+
+Basically: if you rely heavily on reflection-heavy libs or dynamic runtime stuff, expect pain.
+
+------
+
+## Quick demo (conceptual)
+
+```bash
+# Regular publish
+dotnet publish -c Release
+
+# Native AOT publish
+dotnet publish -c Release -r win-x64 -p:PublishAot=true
+```
+
+Boom. You get a native executable. On Linux, drop it into a container and watch that startup time drop like a rock.
+
+------
+
+### Conclusion
+
+- Native AOT in .NET 8 = faster cold starts + lower memory usage.
+- Perfect for microservices, serverless, and CLI apps.
+- Comes with trade-offs (longer builds, less dynamic flexibility).
+- If performance is critical, it’s absolutely worth testing.