Why AmbientUnitOfWork and UnitOfWorkManager are Singleton

[TomatoDinosaurEgg]

I try to read source code recently, I fond that "AmbientUnitOfWork" and "UnitOfWorkManager" are Singletons (implement ISingletonDependency), assume all request use the default reservation name is "_AbpActionUnitOfWork", then does that means all the request will use ChildUnitOfWork instance with the same one parent UnitOfWork instance? If so, I see the method CompleteAsync in ChildUnitOfWork just do nothing (return Task.CompletedTask), that really confused me, does anyone know how it works? Thanks

[maliming]

hi

AsyncLocal is used internally, so there are no conflicts, and since you've looked at the source, I suggest you keep looking at it.

[TomatoDinosaurEgg]

hi

Seems I misunderstood with "AsyncLocal", yes you are right, now everything make sense to me, thank you!