You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I hope this finds you well. I’m reaching out regarding a licensing question that requires clarification for compliance purposes.
Background:
While conducting a FOSS license analysis of our company's project dependencies, I discovered that the file absl/time/internal/cctz/src/tzfile.h in your repository contains a public domain declaration:
/* ** This file is in the public domain, so clarified as of ** 1996-06-05 by Arthur David Olson. */
Questions:
Why does this specific file have a different licensing status (public domain) compared to the rest of the Apache 2.0 licensed project?
Would it be okay to use this file under Creative Commons CC0 v1.0 Universal License (CC0 v1.0)? The Swiss law do not recognize a permanent relinquishment of Copyrights as the Public Domain provides for.
Could you provide a written statement confirming the licensing status of this file and whether it can be used independently of the Apache 2.0 license that covers the rest of the project?
Context:
I need this clarification for our company's legal compliance documentation, as mixed licensing within a single project can create uncertainty about usage rights. A clear written statement from the project maintainers would be extremely helpful for proper attribution and compliance.
Thank you for your time and for maintaining such a valuable library for the C++ community. I look forward to your clarification on this matter.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi there 👋
I hope this finds you well. I’m reaching out regarding a licensing question that requires clarification for compliance purposes.
Background:
While conducting a FOSS license analysis of our company's project dependencies, I discovered that the file
absl/time/internal/cctz/src/tzfile.h
in your repository contains a public domain declaration:Questions:
Context:
I need this clarification for our company's legal compliance documentation, as mixed licensing within a single project can create uncertainty about usage rights. A clear written statement from the project maintainers would be extremely helpful for proper attribution and compliance.
Thank you for your time and for maintaining such a valuable library for the C++ community. I look forward to your clarification on this matter.
Best regards,
Roman
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions