fix(rust): Test suite fixes from final validation by vikrantpuppala · Pull Request #324 · adbc-drivers/databricks

vikrantpuppala · 2026-03-08T06:08:15Z

🥞 Stacked PR

Use this link to review incremental changes.

stack/pr-database-config [Files changed]
- stack/pr-u2m-provider [Files changed]
  - stack/pr-integration-tests [Files changed]
    - stack/pr-final-validation [Files changed]

Summary

Minor fixes discovered while running the full test suite:

Fixed callback server HTML response formatting (content-length calculation)

Key files

src/auth/oauth/callback.rs — HTML response fix

This pull request was AI-assisted by Isaac.

vikrantpuppala · 2026-03-08T11:11:20Z

rust/src/auth/oauth/cache.rs

+    scopes: Vec<String>,
+}
+
+#[allow(dead_code)] // Used in Phase 3 (U2M)


why this? i think this is used now? we should fix all such instances across

vikrantpuppala · 2026-03-08T11:14:13Z

rust/src/auth/oauth/callback.rs

+        <p>You can close this tab and return to your application.</p>
+    </div>
+</body>
+</html>"#;


let's make this page simpler, no need for fancy fonts colours, check marks, etc.

vikrantpuppala · 2026-03-08T11:14:45Z

rust/src/auth/oauth/callback.rs

+        <p>An error occurred during authentication. You can close this tab and try again.</p>
+    </div>
+</body>
+</html>"#;


use simple pages

vikrantpuppala · 2026-03-08T11:18:31Z

rust/src/auth/oauth/m2m.rs

+            // Use block_in_place to avoid blocking the runtime if we're in one,
+            // and get the handle to block_on the async operation
+            tokio::task::block_in_place(|| {
+                tokio::runtime::Handle::current().block_on(async {


shouldn't this happen async? check all instances and see if we're handling this correctly

vikrantpuppala · 2026-03-08T11:22:27Z

rust/src/auth/oauth.rs.old

should we just remove this?

vikrantpuppala · 2026-03-08T11:23:37Z

rust/src/database.rs

+#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
+#[repr(u8)]
+pub enum AuthMechanism {
+    /// Personal access token (no OAuth). Config value: 0
+    Pat = 0,
+    /// OAuth 2.0 -- requires AuthFlow to select the specific flow. Config value: 11
+    OAuth = 11,
+}
+
+impl TryFrom<i64> for AuthMechanism {
+    type Error = crate::error::Error;
+
+    fn try_from(value: i64) -> std::result::Result<Self, Self::Error> {
+        match value {
+            0 => Ok(AuthMechanism::Pat),
+            11 => Ok(AuthMechanism::OAuth),
+            _ => Err(DatabricksErrorHelper::invalid_argument().message(format!(
+                "Invalid auth mechanism value: {}. Valid values are 0 (PAT) or 11 (OAuth)",
+                value
+            ))),
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+/// OAuth authentication flow -- selects the specific OAuth grant type.
+/// Config values match the ODBC driver's Auth_Flow numeric codes.
+/// Only applicable when AuthMechanism is OAuth.
+#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
+#[repr(u8)]
+pub enum AuthFlow {
+    /// Use a pre-obtained OAuth access token directly. Config value: 0
+    TokenPassthrough = 0,
+    /// M2M: client credentials grant for service principals. Config value: 1
+    ClientCredentials = 1,
+    /// U2M: browser-based authorization code + PKCE. Config value: 2
+    Browser = 2,
+}
+
+impl TryFrom<i64> for AuthFlow {
+    type Error = crate::error::Error;
+
+    fn try_from(value: i64) -> std::result::Result<Self, Self::Error> {
+        match value {
+            0 => Ok(AuthFlow::TokenPassthrough),
+            1 => Ok(AuthFlow::ClientCredentials),
+            2 => Ok(AuthFlow::Browser),
+            _ => Err(DatabricksErrorHelper::invalid_argument().message(format!(
+                "Invalid auth flow value: {}. Valid values are 0 (token passthrough), 1 (client credentials), or 2 (browser)",
+                value
+            ))),
+        }
+    }
+}
+


is this the right place to define this? seems like database is becoming bloated?

vikrantpuppala · 2026-03-08T11:25:14Z

rust/src/database.rs

overall would be great if we can abstract out the auth related stuff in this file so that it is less bloated

vikrantpuppala · 2026-03-08T11:25:53Z

rust/CLAUDE.md

 - Test names: `test_<function>_<scenario>`
+- E2E tests that require real Databricks connection should be marked with `#[ignore]`
+
+#### Running E2E OAuth Tests


don't think we need this section

vikrantpuppala · 2026-03-12T07:10:32Z

Range-diff: stack/pr-integration-tests (f87df69 -> b8141fb)

rust/src/auth/oauth/callback.rs

@@ -51,19 +51,4 @@
 -                "GET /callback?error=access_denied&error_description=User%20denied%20consent HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost:{}\r\n\r\n",
 +                "GET /?error=access_denied&error_description=User%20denied%20consent HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost:{}\r\n\r\n",
                  port
-             );
- 
-             uri
-         );
-         // Verify the port is a valid non-zero number
--        let port: u16 = uri.strip_prefix("http://localhost:").unwrap().strip_suffix("/callback").unwrap_or_else(|| uri.strip_prefix("http://localhost:").unwrap()).parse().unwrap();
-+        let port: u16 = uri
-+            .strip_prefix("http://localhost:")
-+            .unwrap()
-+            .strip_suffix("/callback")
-+            .unwrap_or_else(|| uri.strip_prefix("http://localhost:").unwrap())
-+            .parse()
-+            .unwrap();
-         assert!(port > 0, "Expected a non-zero port, got: {}", port);
-     }
- }
\ No newline at end of file
+             );
\ No newline at end of file

rust/src/auth/config.rs

@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-diff --git a/rust/src/auth/config.rs b/rust/src/auth/config.rs
---- a/rust/src/auth/config.rs
-+++ b/rust/src/auth/config.rs
-         match mechanism {
-             AuthMechanism::Pat => {
-                 if access_token.is_none() {
--                    return Err(DatabricksErrorHelper::invalid_argument()
--                        .message(
--                            "databricks.access_token is required when auth mechanism is 0 (PAT)",
--                        ));
-+                    return Err(DatabricksErrorHelper::invalid_argument().message(
-+                        "databricks.access_token is required when auth mechanism is 0 (PAT)",
-+                    ));
-                 }
-             }
-             AuthMechanism::OAuth => {
\ No newline at end of file

rust/src/auth/oauth/cache.rs

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-diff --git a/rust/src/auth/oauth/cache.rs b/rust/src/auth/oauth/cache.rs
---- a/rust/src/auth/oauth/cache.rs
-+++ b/rust/src/auth/oauth/cache.rs
-     scopes: Vec<String>,
- }
- 
--
- impl CacheKey {
-     /// Creates a new cache key from the given parameters.
-     fn new(host: &str, client_id: &str, scopes: &[String]) -> Self {
- /// Cache I/O errors are logged as warnings and never block authentication.
- pub struct TokenCache;
- 
--
- impl TokenCache {
-     /// Returns the cache directory path.
-     /// Location: `~/.config/databricks-adbc/oauth/`
\ No newline at end of file

rust/src/auth/oauth/m2m.rs

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
-diff --git a/rust/src/auth/oauth/m2m.rs b/rust/src/auth/oauth/m2m.rs
---- a/rust/src/auth/oauth/m2m.rs
-+++ b/rust/src/auth/oauth/m2m.rs
-         token_endpoint_override: Option<String>,
-     ) -> Result<Self> {
-         // Discover OIDC endpoints or use override
--        let (token_endpoint, auth_endpoint) = if let Some(token_endpoint) = token_endpoint_override {
-+        let (token_endpoint, auth_endpoint) = if let Some(token_endpoint) = token_endpoint_override
-+        {
-             // Use override for token endpoint, still discover auth endpoint
-             // (auth endpoint is not typically overridden for M2M since it's not used)
-             let endpoints = OidcEndpoints::discover(host, &http_client).await?;
-             scopes,
-         })
-     }
--
- }
- 
- impl AuthProvider for ClientCredentialsProvider {
\ No newline at end of file

rust/src/auth/oauth/token_store.rs

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-diff --git a/rust/src/auth/oauth/token_store.rs b/rust/src/auth/oauth/token_store.rs
---- a/rust/src/auth/oauth/token_store.rs
-+++ b/rust/src/auth/oauth/token_store.rs
-     refreshing: Arc<AtomicBool>,
- }
- 
--
- impl TokenStore {
-     /// Creates a new empty token store.
-     pub fn new() -> Self {
\ No newline at end of file

rust/src/database.rs

@@ -1,141 +0,0 @@
-diff --git a/rust/src/database.rs b/rust/src/database.rs
---- a/rust/src/database.rs
-+++ b/rust/src/database.rs
-                             .to_adbc()
-                     })
-                 }
--                "databricks.auth.scopes" => {
--                    self.auth_config.scopes.clone().ok_or_else(|| {
--                        DatabricksErrorHelper::invalid_state()
--                            .message("option 'databricks.auth.scopes' is not set")
--                            .to_adbc()
--                    })
--                }
-+                "databricks.auth.scopes" => self.auth_config.scopes.clone().ok_or_else(|| {
-+                    DatabricksErrorHelper::invalid_state()
-+                        .message("option 'databricks.auth.scopes' is not set")
-+                        .to_adbc()
-+                }),
-                 "databricks.auth.token_endpoint" => {
-                     self.auth_config.token_endpoint.clone().ok_or_else(|| {
-                         DatabricksErrorHelper::invalid_state()
-         })?;
- 
-         // Validate auth configuration
--        let mechanism = self.auth_config
-+        let mechanism = self
-+            .auth_config
-             .validate(&self.access_token)
-             .map_err(|e| e.to_adbc())?;
- 
-                 ))
-             }
-             AuthMechanism::OAuth => {
--                let flow = self.auth_config.flow.expect("flow should be validated above");
-+                let flow = self
-+                    .auth_config
-+                    .flow
-+                    .expect("flow should be validated above");
-                 match flow {
-                     AuthFlow::TokenPassthrough => {
-                         // Token passthrough - use PersonalAccessToken provider with the provided token
-                     }
-                     AuthFlow::ClientCredentials => {
-                         // Client credentials flow (M2M) - create ClientCredentialsProvider
--                        let client_id = self.auth_config.client_id.as_ref()
-+                        let client_id = self
-+                            .auth_config
-+                            .client_id
-+                            .as_ref()
-                             .expect("client_id should be validated above");
--                        let client_secret = self.auth_config.client_secret.as_ref()
-+                        let client_secret = self
-+                            .auth_config
-+                            .client_secret
-+                            .as_ref()
-                             .expect("client_secret should be validated above");
- 
-                         // Default scope for M2M is "all-apis" (no offline_access since M2M has no refresh token)
-                         let scopes_str = self.auth_config.scopes.as_deref().unwrap_or("all-apis");
--                        let scopes: Vec<String> = scopes_str.split_whitespace().map(String::from).collect();
-+                        let scopes: Vec<String> =
-+                            scopes_str.split_whitespace().map(String::from).collect();
- 
-                         // Create the provider (async operation - needs runtime)
-                         let provider = runtime
--                            .block_on(crate::auth::ClientCredentialsProvider::new_with_full_config(
--                                host,
--                                client_id,
--                                client_secret,
--                                http_client.clone(),
--                                scopes,
--                                self.auth_config.token_endpoint.clone(),
--                            ))
-+                            .block_on(
-+                                crate::auth::ClientCredentialsProvider::new_with_full_config(
-+                                    host,
-+                                    client_id,
-+                                    client_secret,
-+                                    http_client.clone(),
-+                                    scopes,
-+                                    self.auth_config.token_endpoint.clone(),
-+                                ),
-+                            )
-                             .map_err(|e| e.to_adbc())?;
- 
-                         Arc::new(provider)
-         )
-         .unwrap();
- 
--        assert_eq!(db.auth_config.client_secret, Some("test-secret".to_string()));
-+        assert_eq!(
-+            db.auth_config.client_secret,
-+            Some("test-secret".to_string())
-+        );
-         assert_eq!(
-             db.get_option_string(OptionDatabase::Other(
-                 "databricks.auth.client_secret".into()
-         )
-         .unwrap();
- 
--        assert_eq!(db.auth_config.scopes, Some("all-apis offline_access".to_string()));
-+        assert_eq!(
-+            db.auth_config.scopes,
-+            Some("all-apis offline_access".to_string())
-+        );
-         assert_eq!(
-             db.get_option_string(OptionDatabase::Other("databricks.auth.scopes".into()))
-                 .unwrap(),
-         .unwrap();
- 
-         // Verify config is stored correctly
--        assert_eq!(db.auth_mechanism, Some(AuthMechanism::OAuth));
--        assert_eq!(db.auth_flow, Some(AuthFlow::ClientCredentials));
--        assert_eq!(db.auth_client_id, Some("test-client-id".to_string()));
--        assert_eq!(db.auth_client_secret, Some("test-secret".to_string()));
-+        assert_eq!(db.auth_config.mechanism, Some(AuthMechanism::OAuth));
-+        assert_eq!(db.auth_config.flow, Some(AuthFlow::ClientCredentials));
-+        assert_eq!(db.auth_config.client_id, Some("test-client-id".to_string()));
-+        assert_eq!(
-+            db.auth_config.client_secret,
-+            Some("test-secret".to_string())
-+        );
-     }
- 
-     #[test]
- 
-         // Verify custom scopes are stored
-         assert_eq!(
--            db.auth_scopes,
-+            db.auth_config.scopes,
-             Some("custom-scope-1 custom-scope-2".to_string())
-         );
-     }
- 
-         // Verify token_endpoint override is stored
-         assert_eq!(
--            db.auth_token_endpoint,
-+            db.auth_config.token_endpoint,
-             Some("https://custom.endpoint/token".to_string())
-         );
-     }
\ No newline at end of file

rust/tests/oauth_e2e.rs

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-diff --git a/rust/tests/oauth_e2e.rs b/rust/tests/oauth_e2e.rs
---- a/rust/tests/oauth_e2e.rs
-+++ b/rust/tests/oauth_e2e.rs
- 
-     // Create driver and database
-     let mut driver = Driver::new();
--    let mut database = driver
--        .new_database()
--        .expect("Failed to create database");
-+    let mut database = driver.new_database().expect("Failed to create database");
- 
-     // Configure database with M2M OAuth
-     database
- 
-     // Create driver and database
-     let mut driver = Driver::new();
--    let mut database = driver
--        .new_database()
--        .expect("Failed to create database");
-+    let mut database = driver.new_database().expect("Failed to create database");
- 
-     // Configure database with U2M OAuth
-     database
\ No newline at end of file

_{Reproduce locally: git range-diff 4e111ed..f87df69 f3e647c..b8141fb | Disable: git config gitstack.push-range-diff false}

## 🥞 Stacked PR Use this [link](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/319/files) to review incremental changes. - [**stack/oauth-u2m-m2m-design**](#319) [[Files changed](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/319/files)] - [stack/pr-oauth-foundation](#320) [[Files changed](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/320/files/250ff3d91c3001f671f08084f68e949e556bc5d2..bd474c189621aa70c1f14e97c32d64605275e07d)] - [stack/pr-database-config](#321) [[Files changed](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/321/files/bd474c189621aa70c1f14e97c32d64605275e07d..296931cd396d82dccb1b548a51f6b9d31be3683e)] - [stack/pr-u2m-provider](#322) [[Files changed](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/322/files/296931cd396d82dccb1b548a51f6b9d31be3683e..c96689981e79c04f43e8251f2cbd5690371dfca5)] - [stack/pr-integration-tests](#323) [[Files changed](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/323/files/c96689981e79c04f43e8251f2cbd5690371dfca5..83d639337ca30688abb7bdba85aa16426d76eb31)] - [stack/pr-final-validation](#324) [[Files changed](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/324/files/83d639337ca30688abb7bdba85aa16426d76eb31..e2cd82bf1e9510169735774784591074f30351d3)] --------- ## Summary - Design document for adding OAuth 2.0 authentication to the Rust ADBC driver covering both U2M (Authorization Code + PKCE) and M2M (Client Credentials) flows - Sprint plan breaking the implementation into 3 tasks: foundation + HTTP client changes, M2M provider, U2M provider - Uses the `oauth2` crate for protocol-level operations, unified `DatabricksHttpClient` with two-phase `OnceLock` init, and ODBC-aligned numeric config values (`AuthMech`/`Auth_Flow`) ## Key decisions and alternatives considered - **`oauth2` crate adoption** over hand-rolling OAuth protocol (eliminates ~200 lines of boilerplate, handles PKCE/token exchange/refresh) - **Unified HTTP client** (`DatabricksHttpClient` with `OnceLock`) over separate `reqwest::Client` for token calls (shared retry logic, connection pooling) - **ODBC-aligned numeric config** (`mechanism=0/11`, `flow=0/1/2`) over string-based or auto-detection (explicit, predictable, matches ODBC driver) - **Separate U2M/M2M providers** over single OAuthProvider (different flows, refresh strategies, caching needs) - **Separate token cache** (`~/.config/databricks-adbc/oauth/`) over sharing Python SDK cache (fragile cross-SDK compatibility) ## Areas needing specific review focus - Two-phase HTTP client initialization pattern (OnceLock for auth provider) — is this the right approach for breaking the circular dependency? - Token refresh state machine (FRESH/STALE/EXPIRED) — are the thresholds (40s expiry buffer, min(TTL*0.5, 20min) stale) appropriate? - Config option naming (`databricks.auth.mechanism`, `databricks.auth.flow`) — alignment with ODBC driver - Sprint plan task breakdown — is the scope realistic for 2 weeks? --- *Replaces #318 (closed — converted to stacked branch)* 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…tore (#320) ## 🥞 Stacked PR Use this [link](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/320/files) to review incremental changes. - [**stack/pr-oauth-foundation**](#320) [[Files changed](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/320/files)] - [stack/pr-database-config](#321) [[Files changed](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/321/files/78b9ec88459f895c76bd1aea99fcb47e5eb94893..164ada04d14660306c7e44dd3d52a7943050aa27)] - [stack/pr-u2m-provider](#322) [[Files changed](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/322/files/164ada04d14660306c7e44dd3d52a7943050aa27..abc00ced51d89f1a652f78209f692775eba05e73)] - [stack/pr-integration-tests](#323) [[Files changed](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/323/files/abc00ced51d89f1a652f78209f692775eba05e73..75b18d6c594eeba89a30450152d6d6f672239614)] - [stack/pr-final-validation](#324) [[Files changed](https://github.com/adbc-drivers/databricks/pull/324/files/75b18d6c594eeba89a30450152d6d6f672239614..2d6ccb09e121015aa6a0da6e992529a686bb0f04)] --------- ## Summary Adds the core OAuth token infrastructure used by both U2M and M2M flows: - **`OAuthToken`** — token struct with expiry tracking, stale detection (40s buffer / 50% TTL), and serde support - **OIDC discovery** — fetches `authorization_endpoint` and `token_endpoint` from `/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server` - **`TokenCache`** — file-based persistence at `~/.config/databricks-adbc/oauth/` with SHA-256 hashed filenames and `0o600` permissions - **`TokenStore`** — thread-safe token lifecycle (Empty → Fresh → Stale → Expired) with coordinated refresh via `RwLock` + `AtomicBool` - **Cargo dependencies** — `oauth2`, `sha2`, `dirs`, `serde`, `open` crates - **`DatabricksHttpClient`** — extended with `OnceLock`-based auth provider and `inner()` accessor for the `oauth2` crate ### Key files - `src/auth/oauth/token.rs` — `OAuthToken` struct - `src/auth/oauth/oidc.rs` — OIDC endpoint discovery - `src/auth/oauth/cache.rs` — file-based token cache - `src/auth/oauth/token_store.rs` — token lifecycle state machine - `src/client/http.rs` — HTTP client auth provider integration

…2.1-auth-enums

…: task-2.2-database-config-fields

…2.3-database-validation

…1-callback-server

…sk-3.2-u2m-provider

…3-database-integration

…task-4.1-wiremock-u2m-refresh

…sk ID: task-4.2-m2m-database-integration

…end-tests

…alidation

vikrantpuppala · 2026-03-13T17:14:24Z

Folded into PR #323 to reduce stack size.

vikrantpuppala force-pushed the stack/pr-final-validation branch from 727b177 to 0e69f4a Compare March 8, 2026 07:01

vikrantpuppala commented Mar 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

vikrantpuppala force-pushed the stack/pr-final-validation branch from 0e69f4a to 13f8c28 Compare March 9, 2026 05:18

vikrantpuppala changed the title ~~Run full test suite and fix any failures\n\nTask ID: task-5.1-final-validation~~ [PECOBLR-2089] fix(rust/oauth): Test suite fixes from final validation Mar 9, 2026

vikrantpuppala force-pushed the stack/pr-final-validation branch 2 times, most recently from f87df69 to b8141fb Compare March 12, 2026 07:10

vikrantpuppala force-pushed the stack/pr-final-validation branch 2 times, most recently from 7dfee16 to e2cd82b Compare March 12, 2026 13:49

vikrantpuppala force-pushed the stack/pr-final-validation branch 2 times, most recently from 23d69f3 to 01cfd62 Compare March 13, 2026 12:21

vikrantpuppala changed the title ~~[PECOBLR-2089] fix(rust/oauth): Test suite fixes from final validation~~ fix(rust): Test suite fixes from final validation Mar 13, 2026

vikrantpuppala force-pushed the stack/pr-final-validation branch 3 times, most recently from 85d9339 to 2d6ccb0 Compare March 13, 2026 15:59

vikrantpuppala added 2 commits March 13, 2026 16:33

Add AuthMechanism and AuthFlow enums to database.rs\n\nTask ID: task-…

49e4650

…2.1-auth-enums

Add OAuth config fields and set_option parsing to Database\n\nTask ID…

533831e

…: task-2.2-database-config-fields

vikrantpuppala force-pushed the stack/pr-final-validation branch from 2d6ccb0 to 04d7b09 Compare March 13, 2026 16:33

vikrantpuppala added 5 commits March 13, 2026 17:04

Add config validation to Database::new_connection()\n\nTask ID: task-…

3cdbf7c

…2.3-database-validation

Implement CallbackServer for U2M browser redirect\n\nTask ID: task-3.…

d2f43c2

…1-callback-server

Implement AuthorizationCodeProvider for U2M OAuth flow\n\nTask ID: ta…

cea68cd

…sk-3.2-u2m-provider

Wire U2M provider into Database::new_connection()\n\nTask ID: task-3.…

af7f3c8

…3-database-integration

Add wiremock integration test for U2M refresh token flow\n\nTask ID: …

6ef1639

…task-4.1-wiremock-u2m-refresh

vikrantpuppala added 3 commits March 13, 2026 17:06

Complete M2M provider database integration and add config tests\n\nTa…

1f58bd1

…sk ID: task-4.2-m2m-database-integration

Add end-to-end OAuth tests (M2M and U2M)\n\nTask ID: task-4.3-end-to-…

6864649

…end-tests

Run full test suite and fix any failures\n\nTask ID: task-5.1-final-v…

720434f

…alidation

vikrantpuppala force-pushed the stack/pr-final-validation branch from 04d7b09 to 720434f Compare March 13, 2026 17:07

vikrantpuppala closed this Mar 13, 2026

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

fix(rust): Test suite fixes from final validation#324

fix(rust): Test suite fixes from final validation#324
vikrantpuppala wants to merge 10 commits intoadbc-drivers:mainfrom
vikrantpuppala:stack/pr-final-validation

vikrantpuppala commented Mar 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala Mar 8, 2026

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala commented Mar 13, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

vikrantpuppala commented Mar 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🥞 Stacked PR

Summary

Key files

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

vikrantpuppala commented Mar 13, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

vikrantpuppala commented Mar 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading