Reasoning spec question #618
trend-denny-lee
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Hey @trend-denny-lee, you bring up a good question and I'd like to get the right answer for you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
@NathanTarbert |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello, I’ve been meaning to ask about something in your spec.
You currently have:
ReasoningStart
and
ReasoningEnd
However, in many of our implementations, reasoning often appears interspersed with various pieces of information, so it may not be necessary to structure reasoning as a grouped block.
Instead, it might make more sense to handle it like Message, using only:
TextMessageStart
TextMessageContent
TextMessageEnd
I’m wondering why you chose to include a separate Start and End for reasoning.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions