Skip to content

Conversation

@lazebnyi
Copy link
Contributor

@lazebnyi lazebnyi commented Mar 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced data processing with improved pagination. The system now returns structured responses that clearly indicate when additional records are available.
  • Tests

    • Updated tests to validate the new response structure and pagination behavior, ensuring reliable data retrieval.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 21, 2025 22:43
@github-actions github-actions bot added the chore label Mar 21, 2025
@lazebnyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

lazebnyi commented Mar 21, 2025

/autofix

Auto-Fix Job Info

This job attempts to auto-fix any linting or formating issues. If any fixes are made,
those changes will be automatically committed and pushed back to the PR.

Note: This job can only be run by maintainers. On PRs from forks, this command requires
that the PR author has enabled the Allow edits from maintainers option.

PR auto-fix job started... Check job output.

✅ Changes applied successfully.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 21, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes update the data extraction and pagination logic in the HTTP components resolver. The record_selector extractor's field_path is now set to ["data"], and a new paginator configuration using DefaultPaginator has been added. This paginator is configured with options such as page_token_option and pagination_strategy to retrieve the next cursor and check for additional records based on the has_more field. The associated test case has been revised to expect a structured JSON response that includes data, has_more, and next_cursor fields.

Changes

File Change Summary
unit_tests/…/test_http_components_resolver.py Updated record_selector extractor's field_path from [] to ["data"]; added DefaultPaginator configuration with page_token_option and pagination_strategy; updated test case test_dynamic_streams_with_http_components_resolver_retriever_with_parent_stream to expect a JSON response containing data, has_more, and next_cursor fields.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test
    participant HttpComponentsResolver
    participant DefaultPaginator
    participant API

    Test->>HttpComponentsResolver: Invoke data retrieval
    HttpComponentsResolver->>API: Send request for data
    API-->>HttpComponentsResolver: Return JSON { data, has_more, next_cursor }
    HttpComponentsResolver->>DefaultPaginator: Configure paginator with next_cursor & has_more
    alt More Records Available
        DefaultPaginator->>API: Request next page (using page_token_option)
        API-->>DefaultPaginator: Return next page response
        DefaultPaginator->>HttpComponentsResolver: Aggregate data
    end
    HttpComponentsResolver-->>Test: Return aggregated data
Loading

Would you like any further refinements or additional diagrams to illustrate other aspects of the changes, wdyt?

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
unit_tests/sources/declarative/resolvers/test_http_components_resolver.py (2)

558-578: Good implementation of paginated mock responses.

The test data structure has been updated to support pagination with a well-structured format that includes:

  • A data array containing the actual records
  • Pagination metadata (has_more, next_cursor)
  • Two pages of responses with appropriate pagination signals

Perhaps we could explicitly set next_cursor: null in the last page for even more robust testing? This would verify that the code handles both the absence of a field and an explicit null value properly, wdyt?

                            "data": [
                                {"id": 2, "name": "item_2"},
                            ],
                            "has_more": False,
+                           "next_cursor": None,
                        }

284-297: Consider enhancing test assertions for pagination completeness.

While the test correctly verifies the total number of streams and records, it doesn't explicitly confirm that records from both pages were processed. Would it be helpful to add assertions that specifically verify records from each page were included?

    assert len(actual_catalog.streams) == 4
    assert [stream.name for stream in actual_catalog.streams] == expected_stream_names
    assert len(records) == 4

    actual_record_stream_names = [record.stream for record in records]
    actual_record_stream_names.sort()

    assert actual_record_stream_names == expected_stream_names
+   
+   # Verify that records from both pages were processed
+   record_ids = set()
+   for record in records:
+       # Extract the item ID from the stream name (format: parent_X_item_Y)
+       item_id = record.stream.split('_')[-1]
+       record_ids.add(item_id)
+   assert record_ids == {'1', '2'}, "Records from both pagination pages should be present"

Also applies to: 558-578

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 837913f and ab53209.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • unit_tests/sources/declarative/resolvers/test_http_components_resolver.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
unit_tests/sources/declarative/resolvers/test_http_components_resolver.py (1)
airbyte_cdk/test/mock_http/mocker.py (1) (1)
  • get (94-95)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
  • GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
  • GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
  • GitHub Check: SDM Docker Image Build
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
unit_tests/sources/declarative/resolvers/test_http_components_resolver.py (2)

284-297: Enhanced extractor field path and added pagination support.

The changes to the record selector's extractor field path and the addition of a paginator are well-implemented. This shifts the data extraction from the root level to a nested "data" field, which is a common pattern for paginated APIs.

The pagination strategy is well-configured, using cursor-based pagination that:

  • Fetches the next page using the page_cursor parameter
  • Gets the next cursor from the next_cursor field
  • Stops when has_more is false

569-570: Correctly implemented paginated request.

The test correctly validates that the second request includes the page cursor parameter from the first response. This confirms that the pagination mechanism properly passes cursor values between requests.

@lazebnyi lazebnyi requested a review from maxi297 March 26, 2025 15:34
@lazebnyi lazebnyi merged commit 15182cf into main Mar 27, 2025
21 checks passed
@lazebnyi lazebnyi deleted the lazebnyi/extend-http-resolver-unit-tests-with-pagination branch March 27, 2025 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants