Skip to content

fix: exception oauth string error #423

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
artem1205 merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2025
Merged

fix: exception oauth string error #423

artem1205 merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2025

Conversation

@artem1205
Copy link
Contributor

@artem1205 artem1205 commented Mar 14, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved the clarity of error messaging when access token information is missing, aiding in easier identification of authentication issues.

@artem1205
fix: exception string error
9cd6df7 
Signed-off-by: Artem Inzhyyants <[email protected]>
@artem1205 artem1205 requested a review from bazarnov March 14, 2025 10:41
@artem1205 artem1205 self-assigned this Mar 14, 2025
@artem1205 artem1205 marked this pull request as ready for review March 14, 2025 10:41
@github-actions github-actions bot added bug Something isn't working security labels Mar 14, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 14, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This change updates the exception message in the _ensure_access_token_in_response method of the AbstractOauth2Authenticator class. The update replaces a standard string formatting approach with an f-string to ensure that the output includes the value returned by self.get_access_token_name(). The method's overall logic and flow remain unchanged, while the error message is now clearer when the access token is missing from the response.

Changes

File Change Summary
airbyte_cdk/.../abstract_oauth.py Updated the exception message in _ensure_access_token_in_response to use an f-string instead of standard string formatting, enabling proper variable interpolation.

Would you like any additional details or context added to this summary, wdyt?

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a8cb92 and 9cd6df7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • airbyte_cdk/sources/streams/http/requests_native_auth/abstract_oauth.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: Check: 'source-pokeapi' (skip=false)
  • GitHub Check: Check: 'source-amplitude' (skip=false)
  • GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
  • GitHub Check: Check: 'source-hardcoded-records' (skip=false)
  • GitHub Check: SDM Docker Image Build
  • GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
  • GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
  • GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/streams/http/requests_native_auth/abstract_oauth.py (1)

250-250: Good improvement to the error message format!

Nice use of f-strings here to properly display the access token name in the error message. This will make debugging easier when the token refresh API response is missing the access token. Previously, it seems the value of self.get_access_token_name() wasn't being interpolated correctly in the message.

Would you consider adding additional context in this error message, like suggesting potential causes for the missing token? For example, incorrect access token name configuration or API changes? wdyt?

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@artem1205 artem1205 merged commit e9f23a0 into main Mar 14, 2025
26 of 27 checks passed
@artem1205 artem1205 deleted the artem1205/fix-exception-string-error branch March 14, 2025 11:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@bazarnov bazarnov bazarnov approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@artem1205 artem1205

Labels

bug Something isn't working security

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@artem1205 @bazarnov