[DOC] Style matters #363
RaoOfPhysics
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
Thanks for highlighting this @RaoOfPhysics! I'm assigning this issue to you and me, so that we can co-work on this at some point (perhaps during a scivision coworking session one wednesday). Thx |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@AidaMehonic, would you like to discuss this during the co-working session this afternoon? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I’ve noticed that there is a little inconsistency about whether the project name is spelt with or without capitals (i.e. Scivision vs scivision) in the documentation. I also noticed that while the Turing annual report [PDF for 2021-’22 report] uses
catalogue
, the Scivision documentation uses the en_US spelling (catalog
) while the issues filed by the team use a mix of both.Should we use a standard spelling style across all the documentation (including in the GitHub readme)?
I’d be happy to tackle this at some point. 😄
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions