Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 12, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
oxlint (source) 1.5.0 -> 1.6.0 age confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

oxc-project/oxc (oxlint)

v1.6.0: oxlint v1.6.0

Compare Source

[1.6.0] - 2025-07-07

🐛 Bug Fixes
  • 3f0e03e linter: Fix inconsistent behavior in no-duplicate-imports rule (#​12051) (yefan)
  • 6dbacea linter/no-barrel-file: No diagnostic tag when some modules arent resolved (#​12049) (camc314)
  • dd6b1ee linter/extensions: False positives with non configured extensions (#​11872) (camc314)
  • 5851d2c oxlint: Always follow symlinks; remove cli flag --symlinks (#​12048) (Boshen)
  • eb1c596 linter/consistent-index-object-style: Fix default impl for rule config (#​12031) (camc314)
🚜 Refactor
📚 Documentation
  • 85ec382 linter: Add good/bad example for nextjs/no-page-custom-font (#​12092) (Sysix)
  • 9240342 linter: Add docs for nextjs/no-script-component-in-head (#​12091) (Sysix)
  • 0878414 linter: Add good/bad example for nextjs/no-head-import-in-document (#​12061) (Sysix)
  • 222bc73 linter: Add bad/good example for nextjs/no-head-element (#​12059) (Sysix)
  • a7e9f50 linter: Add good/bad example for nextjs/no-title-in-document-head (#​12065) (Sysix)
  • 51c6818 linter: Add good/bad example for nextjs/no-document-import-in-pages (#​12064) (Sysix)
  • c7b38f9 consistent-indexed-object-style: Clarify docs (#​12019) (Luca Ban)
⚡ Performance
  • 04e2de5 linter: Avoid iteration when checking import is AllButDefault or SideEffect in eslint/no-duplicate-imports (#​12093) (Sysix)
  • e2a7d6a linter: Check filepath before running nextjs/no-head-element (#​12062) (Sysix)
  • 00a9fd9 linter: Check for filename before running nextjs/no-head-import-in-document rule (#​12060) (Sysix)
  • 62a3ce0 linter: Replace unicode-segmentation crate with icu_segmenter (#​12063) (Sysix)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 4pm on friday,before 9am on monday,every weekend" in timezone Europe/Paris, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 12, 2025 19:31
@renovate renovate bot requested review from millotp and morganleroi and removed request for a team July 12, 2025 19:31
@algolia-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

algolia-bot commented Jul 12, 2025

✔️ Code generated!

Name Link
🪓 Triggered by cd2409f7198886dc9a1a20d967327bdc09d65ff3
🍃 Generated commit a752ad1442ea434ef77ab9983a3c2f40c6f27442
🌲 Generated branch generated/renovate/oxlint-monorepo
📊 Benchmark results

Benchmarks performed on the method using a mock server, the results might not reflect the real-world performance.

Language Req/s
go 1784
javascript 1683
php 1510
csharp 1276
java 1102
python 1095
ruby 824
swift 588
scala 23

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/oxlint-monorepo branch 8 times, most recently from 213ae6f to 0c7d002 Compare July 12, 2025 21:58
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/oxlint-monorepo branch from 0c7d002 to bac8eab Compare July 12, 2025 22:19
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 300e137 into chore/renovateBaseBranch Jul 12, 2025
29 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/oxlint-monorepo branch July 12, 2025 22:40
algolia-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2025
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants