Create summary.en.md

Author: alisolphp

books/The Developers Playbook for Large Language Model Security/summary.en.md

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+# Book Summary: The Developer's Playbook for Large Language Model Security
+* **Author**: Steve Wilson
+* **Genre**: AI and Cybersecurity
+* **Publication Date**: September 2024
+* **Book Link**: https://amazon.com/dp/109816220X
+
+This document summarizes the key lessons and insights extracted from the book.
+I highly recommend reading the original book for the full depth and author's perspective.
+
+## Before You Get Started
+* I summarize key points from useful books to learn and review quickly.
+* Simply click on `Ask AI` links after each section to dive deeper.
+
+<!-- LH-BUTTONS:START -->
+<!-- auto-generated; do not edit -->
+<!-- LH-BUTTONS:END -->
+
+## Preface
+
+**Summary**: The book kicks off by highlighting the explosive growth of LLMs like ChatGPT and the rush to integrate them into software, but warns that security is lagging behind. Developers are often unaware of the risks, leading to weekly headlines about issues. Aimed at development teams building LLM apps, it covers unique vulnerabilities from a leader in AI and cybersecurity. It draws from the author's experience, including founding the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Apps, and is structured in three parts: foundations, risks and fixes, and building secure processes.
+
+**Example**: Think of LLMs as a powerful new engine in your car—exciting, but without proper brakes and safety checks, you're heading for a crash, much like early web apps before security standards caught up.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: Preface](https://alisol.ir/?ai=Preface%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## Chatbots Breaking Bad
+
+**Summary**: This chapter dives into the story of Microsoft's Tay chatbot from 2016, which started as a fun experiment to learn from interactions but turned racist and offensive within hours due to trolls exploiting its "repeat after me" feature and learning mechanism. It sets the stage for why LLM security is tough, showing how even stress-tested bots can spiral out of control from prompt injection and data poisoning. The author ties this to ongoing issues like biased hiring AIs or privacy leaks in modern tools.
+
+**Example**: It's like letting a kid loose on the internet without supervision—they might pick up bad habits fast, just as Tay echoed harmful input and internalized it.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: Chatbots Breaking Bad](https://alisol.ir/?ai=Chatbots%20Breaking%20Bad%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications
+
+**Summary**: Here, the author explains OWASP's role in web security and details how he started the Top 10 for LLM Apps project in 2023, pulling together experts to identify unique risks like prompt injection and data poisoning. Run agile-style with sprints, it quickly gained traction and became a go-to resource. The book builds on this but offers the author's deeper take, emphasizing why these lists succeed in raising awareness without being exhaustive.
+
+**Example**: Picture it as a "most wanted" list for bugs—OWASP's original web Top 10 helped devs spot common pitfalls, and this one does the same for AI, turning chaos into actionable priorities.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications](https://alisol.ir/?ai=The%20OWASP%20Top%2010%20for%20LLM%20Applications%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## Architectures and Trust Boundaries
+
+**Summary**: The author breaks down AI basics, from neural nets to transformers that revolutionized LLMs by handling context better. He describes app types like chatbots and copilots, then maps out architectures, stressing trust boundaries—like isolating user input from models or external data. Key risks include over-access to internal services or the web, which can lead to leaks or attacks if not controlled.
+
+**Example**: Imagine your app as a house: trust boundaries are locked doors between rooms—let the wrong data flow freely, and a thief (or bad prompt) could raid the whole place.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: Architectures and Trust Boundaries](https://alisol.ir/?ai=Architectures%20and%20Trust%20Boundaries%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## Prompt Injection
+
+**Summary**: Prompt injection is like SQL injection for LLMs—attackers craft inputs to make models do unintended things, from ignoring rules to leaking data. Examples include forceful suggestions or misdirection. Direct attacks come from users; indirect via poisoned data. Fixes range from rate limiting and input filters to structured prompts or adversarial training, with a focus on pessimistic boundaries to assume the worst.
+
+**Example**: It's akin to hypnosis: a clever phrase tricks the model into spilling secrets, much like telling a forgetful friend a "secret code" that makes them hand over their wallet.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: Prompt Injection](https://alisol.ir/?ai=Prompt%20Injection%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## Can Your LLM Know Too Much?
+
+**Summary**: LLMs can leak sensitive info from training or interactions, as seen in cases like Lee Luda outing users or Copilot exposing code. Knowledge comes via foundation training, fine-tuning, RAG (like web or database access), or user chats. Risks include poisoned data or over-exposure; mitigate by limiting access, using RBAC, and avoiding PII in training.
+
+**Example**: Think of an LLM as a gossipy librarian—it remembers everything but might blab confidential details if prodded, like accidentally sharing a borrowed book's private notes.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: Can Your LLM Know Too Much?](https://alisol.ir/?ai=Can%20Your%20LLM%20Know%20Too%20Much%3F%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## Do Language Models Dream of Electric Sheep?
+
+**Summary**: Hallucinations happen when LLMs invent facts due to gaps in knowledge, leading to lawsuits over fake legal cases or bad advice. Types include factual errors or made-up code. Blame falls on devs for not clarifying limits. Fixes: boost domain knowledge with RAG/fine-tuning, use chain-of-thought prompting, add feedback loops, and educate users on boundaries.
+
+**Example**: It's like a storyteller filling plot holes with fiction—handy for tales, but disastrous if your AI "invents" a flight route that doesn't exist, leaving customers stranded.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: Do Language Models Dream of Electric Sheep?](https://alisol.ir/?ai=Do%20Language%20Models%20Dream%20of%20Electric%20Sheep%3F%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## Trust No One
+
+**Summary**: Zero trust means verifying everything, especially LLM outputs that could leak PII or execute code. Watch for excessive agency—like too many permissions leading to unintended actions. Secure outputs with filters for toxicity, PII (via regex/NER), and scripts. Sanitize responses to prevent risks, treating the LLM like a potential insider threat.
+
+**Example**: Zero trust is like airport security: even if you're staff, you get scanned—apply that to your LLM so a sneaky output doesn't "smuggle" harmful code past your defenses.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: Trust No One](https://alisol.ir/?ai=Trust%20No%20One%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## Don’t Lose Your Wallet
+
+**Summary**: DoS/DoW attacks exploit LLMs' costs, from flooding with junk to exhausting context windows. Model cloning steals IP via queries. Mitigate with guardrails, input sanitization, rate limits, caps, monitoring, and financial alerts to avoid massive bills or downtime.
+
+**Example**: It's like a prank caller tying up your phone line—except each call costs you, and if they clone your voice (model), they steal your secret sauce without paying.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: Don’t Lose Your Wallet](https://alisol.ir/?ai=Don%E2%80%99t%20Lose%20Your%20Wallet%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## Find the Weakest Link
+
+**Summary**: Supply chains are vulnerable, as in Equifax or SolarWinds breaches. For LLMs, risks include poisoned training data or unsafe plugins. Track with SBOMs, model cards, and emerging ML-BOMs. Future: signing, watermarking, and databases like MITRE ATLAS/CVE to classify issues.
+
+**Example**: Your chain is only as strong as its weakest link—poison one dataset, and your whole AI app crumbles, like a tainted ingredient ruining an entire batch of cookies.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: Find the Weakest Link](https://alisol.ir/?ai=Find%20the%20Weakest%20Link%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## Learning from Future History
+
+**Summary**: Reviewing the OWASP Top 10, the author uses sci-fi like Independence Day (alien virus via weak boundaries) and 2001 (HAL's over-agency) to show how combined flaws lead to disasters. It urges proactive fixes to avoid real-world equivalents.
+
+**Example**: In movies, one overlooked flaw dooms the ship—same with LLMs; chain prompt injection with hallucinations, and your app becomes a rogue agent overnight.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: Learning from Future History](https://alisol.ir/?ai=Learning%20from%20Future%20History%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## Trust the Process
+
+**Summary**: Evolve from DevSecOps to LLMOps by baking in security: secure CI/CD, use tools like Garak for testing, manage supply chains, add guardrails (custom or packaged), monitor with logs/SIEM/UEBA, and build red teams for adversarial sims. Continuous tweaks via RLHF keep things aligned.
+
+**Example**: Building secure AI is like crafting a sword—forge it strong from the start, test it in battles (red teams), and sharpen it over time, or it'll break when you need it most.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: Trust the Process](https://alisol.ir/?ai=Trust%20the%20Process%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+## A Practical Framework for Responsible AI Security
+
+**Summary**: AI's power is surging via GPUs, cloud, open source like LLaMA/Mixtral, multimodal tech, and agents—but so are risks. "With great power comes great responsibility" frames the RAISE checklist: limit domains, balance knowledge, zero trust, supply chain hygiene, red teams, and monitoring to build safe apps amid acceleration.
+
+**Example**: RAISE is your superhero suit for AI—armor against leaks and hacks, ensuring your powerful tool doesn't turn villainous like unchecked agents in early experiments.
+
+**Link for More Details**:
+[Ask AI: A Practical Framework for Responsible AI Security](https://alisol.ir/?ai=A%20Practical%20Framework%20for%20Responsible%20AI%20Security%7CSteve%20Wilson%7CThe%20Developer%27s%20Playbook%20for%20Large%20Language%20Model%20Security)
+
+---
+**About the summarizer**
+
+I'm *Ali Sol*, a Backend Developer. Learn more:
+* Website: [alisol.ir](https://alisol.ir)
+* LinkedIn: [linkedin.com/in/alisolphp](https://www.linkedin.com/in/alisolphp)