Bearer Token wizard would save a lot of time, complexity & bad practice #2283
Closed
billhannah
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Sounds reasonable to have common auth methods in the header section |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
At the company I work for, most of my co-workers use Postman. Personally, I refused for a long time.
I had been using Insomnia for a while, and I found it much easier to use. But with their most recent release they lost my trust, and I will no longer be using their product. So, I'm looking for a replacemet.
One thing I really loved about Insomnia was how easy it was to get a bearer token. I would set up a Form Post request to the token server that had the form fields & authoriziation header. Then on the query, there was a tab for Auth Type, and
Bearer
is an option. If i chose that, there was a field forToken
. This could be set as the response from one of my form post requests & I could put an XPath value for the path to the token value. Made setting up new queries so much easier.But you seem to be doing the "Postman" way - needing to write the same javascript over and over again to get the token, set it as an environment variable, then manually set a header to pull the token out of the environment variable.
Authorization methods are standardized - this work could and should be automated so we don't need to keep copy/pasting JS code to perform a standard workflow.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions