Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
@volphy, if the main goal is to have correct version output, there is no need in updating it to another branch. The patch that fixes the issue looks pretty straight forward: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jq/blob/rawhide/f/fix-version-output.patch
I confirm that AL2023's
I'll let the SIG owners know about the issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Will there be a jq 1.7.1 with the fix in the next released version of Amazon Linux 2023? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Current Amazon Linux 2023 release provides jq 1.7.1:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/linux/al2023/release-notes/all-packages-AL2023.8.html
This jq release works very well but it has a pesky bug:
$ jq --version
jq-
This flag is useful in various CICD scenarios.
There are several open issues in GitHub e.g.,
jqlang/jq#3343
Anyway, in jq 1.8.x the above-mentioned issue is fixed (MacOS):
$ jq --version
jq-1.8.1
I know that jq 1.8.0 contains some backwards-incompatible changes:
https://github.com/jqlang/jq/releases/tag/jq-1.8.0
Is it possible that jq be upgraded to 1.8.x in Amazon Linux 2023?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions