|
| 1 | +# Feature Specification: Workflow Status and Notifications Dashboard |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**Feature Branch**: `001-https-github-com` |
| 4 | +**Created**: 2025-09-24 |
| 5 | +**Status**: Draft |
| 6 | +**Input**: User description: "<https://github.com/ambient-code/vTeam/issues/122>" |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +## Execution Flow (main) |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +```text |
| 11 | +1. Parse user description from Input |
| 12 | + � If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided" |
| 13 | +2. Extract key concepts from description |
| 14 | + � Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints |
| 15 | +3. For each unclear aspect: |
| 16 | + � Mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] |
| 17 | +4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section |
| 18 | + � If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios" |
| 19 | +5. Generate Functional Requirements |
| 20 | + � Each requirement must be testable |
| 21 | + � Mark ambiguous requirements |
| 22 | +6. Identify Key Entities (if data involved) |
| 23 | +7. Run Review Checklist |
| 24 | + � If any [NEEDS CLARIFICATION]: WARN "Spec has uncertainties" |
| 25 | + � If implementation details found: ERROR "Remove tech details" |
| 26 | +8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning) |
| 27 | +``` |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +--- |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +## � Quick Guidelines |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +- Focus on WHAT users need and WHY |
| 34 | +- L Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure) |
| 35 | +- =e Written for business stakeholders, not developers |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +### Section Requirements |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature |
| 40 | +- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature |
| 41 | +- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A") |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +### For AI Generation |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +When creating this spec from a user prompt: |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +1. **Mark all ambiguities**: Use [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] for any assumption you'd need to make |
| 48 | +2. **Don't guess**: If the prompt doesn't specify something (e.g., "login system" without auth method), mark it |
| 49 | +3. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item |
| 50 | +4. **Common underspecified areas**: |
| 51 | + - User types and permissions |
| 52 | + - Data retention/deletion policies |
| 53 | + - Performance targets and scale |
| 54 | + - Error handling behaviors |
| 55 | + - Integration requirements |
| 56 | + - Security/compliance needs |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +--- |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)* |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +### Primary User Story |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +As a software development team member, I need a centralized dashboard that shows me the current status of all workflow activities so I can understand what work is available for me to pick up, what's currently in progress, and where bottlenecks might be occurring in our development process. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +### Acceptance Scenarios |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +1. **Given** I am logged into the workflow dashboard, **When** I view the left-column workflow status, **Then** I can see the current status of all active workflows with time and cost metrics |
| 69 | +2. **Given** there is pending work assigned to me, **When** I check the notification system, **Then** I see an envelope icon indicating unread messages and can view the details of work waiting for my attention |
| 70 | +3. **Given** I complete a workflow step, **When** the system updates, **Then** the next team member receives a notification that work is ready for handoff |
| 71 | +4. **Given** I am viewing a workflow step, **When** I examine the metadata, **Then** I can see attribution information including time spent, cost incurred, and tools used (e.g., which LLM processed this step) |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +### Edge Cases |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +- What happens when a workflow step fails or times out? |
| 76 | +- How does the system handle conflicting work assignments or multiple people trying to claim the same task? |
| 77 | +- What occurs when notification delivery fails or team members are unavailable? |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +## Requirements *(mandatory)* |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +### Functional Requirements |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +- **FR-001**: System MUST display a left-column workflow dashboard showing current status of all active workflows |
| 84 | +- **FR-002**: System MUST show what workflow steps are next and what steps are waiting for action |
| 85 | +- **FR-003**: System MUST display per-step metrics including time spent and cost incurred |
| 86 | +- **FR-004**: System MUST show step attribution indicating which team member or system processed each step |
| 87 | +- **FR-005**: System MUST display metadata for each step including tools used (e.g., LLM model information) |
| 88 | +- **FR-006**: System MUST provide a notification system similar to GitHub inbox or Jira kanban board |
| 89 | +- **FR-007**: System MUST display a small envelope icon when there are unread messages or pending work items |
| 90 | +- **FR-008**: Team members MUST be able to view details of work waiting for their attention |
| 91 | +- **FR-009**: System MUST enable seamless work handoffs between team members |
| 92 | +- **FR-010**: System MUST provide real-time updates when workflow status changes |
| 93 | +- **FR-011**: System MUST authenticate users to ensure secure access to workflow information [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: authentication method not specified - SSO, email/password, existing system integration?] |
| 94 | +- **FR-012**: System MUST track workflow interactions between humans and computers [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific interaction types and data points to track not detailed] |
| 95 | +- **FR-013**: System MUST handle work assignment conflicts [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: conflict resolution mechanism not specified] |
| 96 | +- **FR-014**: System MUST define data retention policies [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: how long workflow data, metrics, and notifications should be retained] |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)* |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +- **Workflow**: Represents a sequence of steps in the software development process, contains status, current step, and overall progress information |
| 101 | +- **WorkflowStep**: Individual step within a workflow, includes time metrics, cost data, attribution, metadata, and completion status |
| 102 | +- **Notification**: Message or alert for team members, contains work item details, priority level, and read status |
| 103 | +- **TeamMember**: User who can interact with workflows, includes role information, notification preferences, and current work assignments |
| 104 | +- **WorkItem**: Unit of work that can be assigned and transferred between team members, contains description, status, and assignment history |
| 105 | +- **Metrics**: Performance data for workflow steps, includes time spent, cost calculations, and tool usage information |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +--- |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +## Review & Acceptance Checklist |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +**GATE: Automated checks run during main() execution** |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +### Content Quality |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) |
| 116 | +- [x] Focused on user value and business needs |
| 117 | +- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders |
| 118 | +- [x] All mandatory sections completed |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +### Requirement Completeness |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +- [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain |
| 123 | +- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous |
| 124 | +- [x] Success criteria are measurable |
| 125 | +- [x] Scope is clearly bounded |
| 126 | +- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +--- |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +## Execution Status |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +**Updated by main() during processing** |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +- [x] User description parsed |
| 135 | +- [x] Key concepts extracted |
| 136 | +- [x] Ambiguities marked |
| 137 | +- [x] User scenarios defined |
| 138 | +- [x] Requirements generated |
| 139 | +- [x] Entities identified |
| 140 | +- [ ] Review checklist passed (pending clarification resolution) |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +--- |
0 commit comments