Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
More info on #1589. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
The rule is now opt-in (#1620). I hope someone will rewrite it so it comes a bit closer to what it should actually do... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As @felixfontein suggested several times the removal of the no-log-password rule due to its high level of false-positive and false-negative matches, I would like to make a survey among ansible-lint users regarding which direction we should take.
Please note that we already made a change on master that should make it only report when looping is used as for the other cases ansible build-in protection should be enough to avoid leaking secrets. Still, looping is known to easily cause undesired exposures.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions