GH-48978: [Python] test failures on pandas 3.0 (currently CI on 2.3.3) #48979
+11
−6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tadeja
requested review from
assignUser,
jonkeane,
kou and
raulcd
as code owners
|
|
Contributor
Author
|
Failures replicated here on CI job AMD64 Conda Python 3.13 Pandas latest |
Contributor
Author
|
Proposed fixes complete previously failing tests with success, you can see it is with pandas 3.0, with |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
See #48978
What changes are included in this PR?
Attempt to run tests on CI pandas latest not with pandas 2.3.3 but actually with 3.0 in order to get the locally replicated test failures to show up, and later introduce the fix for those.
Are these changes tested?
Upgrade of pandas and fix for failures
ValueError: fromutc: dt.tzinfo is not selfalready tested locally.Are there any user-facing changes?
No.