Skip to content

Conversation

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

@kennknowles kennknowles commented May 22, 2025

Just fixing up a couple files I touched in the course of my daily work. There are a number of helper commits in this PR that I want to keep separate as there's no need to roll them back, and it will make the commit history cleaner for people looking at particular files.


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@kennknowles kennknowles force-pushed the SimpleDoFnRunner-nullness branch from 838bc5c to 3d608d3 Compare May 22, 2025 20:19
@kennknowles kennknowles marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2025 20:19
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers:

R: @m-trieu for label java.

Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewers are already assigned to this PR: @m-trieu

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

Friendly ping - this should be a quick and easy review. Mostly just adding null checks and annotation to reduce null checks.

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

assign to next reviewer

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

assign set of reviewers

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewers are already assigned to this PR: @m-trieu

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

R: @Abacn

Can I ask you to look at this? Since they are core Java SDK pieces.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment assign set of reviewers

@derrickaw derrickaw requested a review from Abacn August 12, 2025 15:09
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 60 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Oct 12, 2025
@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

Not stale - I'll resolve the conflict but the main changes here are going to be about the same.

@kennknowles kennknowles removed the stale label Oct 14, 2025
@Abacn
Copy link
Contributor

Abacn commented Oct 14, 2025

sorry missed that. Taking a look. Since this is a pretty common code path and in the past there were occurrences checkstyle fix had introduced unintended issue, I suggest check it in after release cut (so we get time to have all tests exercised)

@kennknowles kennknowles force-pushed the SimpleDoFnRunner-nullness branch from 3d608d3 to f07ca33 Compare October 21, 2025 17:24
@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

I can also add trigger files, but this potentially touches so much it probably just makes sense to merge and rollback if there is a problem.

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

Well, I wouldn't say it "touches so much". I didn't actually refactor anything, just added checks and annotations mostly this time. But what I mean is "there is so much downstream of this".

@github-actions github-actions bot added the io label Oct 21, 2025
@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

Flake in :runners:java-fn-execution:test org.apache.beam.runners.fnexecution.logging.GrpcLoggingServiceTest. testMultipleClientsFailingIsHandledGracefullyByServer

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

got it rebased and green

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

friendly ping

Copy link
Contributor

@Abacn Abacn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry for the delay, this lgtm. Retriggering the test (in order to run the PR merging onto current HEAD)

@Abacn Abacn closed this Nov 17, 2025
@Abacn Abacn reopened this Nov 17, 2025
@kennknowles kennknowles merged commit 2a06694 into apache:master Nov 19, 2025
51 of 53 checks passed
@kennknowles kennknowles deleted the SimpleDoFnRunner-nullness branch November 19, 2025 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants