Skip to content

Conversation

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

Just fixing stuff up as I re-learn this corner of the codebase.


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @kennknowles, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the nullness safety and clarity within the Beam SQL extension. By systematically removing broad nullness suppression annotations, introducing explicit null checks at critical points, and applying @Nullable type annotations, the changes aim to make the codebase more robust against null pointer exceptions and easier to reason about for developers and static analysis tools. The modifications touch core components related to schema management, table resolution, and UDF creation.

Highlights

  • Nullness Annotations Removal: Removed numerous @SuppressWarnings({"keyfor", "nullness"}) annotations across several files, indicating a move towards stricter nullness checking and improved code quality within the Beam SQL extension.
  • Explicit Null Checks: Introduced org.apache.beam.sdk.util.Preconditions.checkArgumentNotNull and checkStateNotNull in various methods to explicitly validate non-null arguments and states, preventing potential NullPointerExceptions at runtime.
  • Nullable Type Annotations: Added @Nullable annotations to method parameters and return types in key interfaces and classes (Schema, TableProvider, PipelineOptions, etc.) to clearly define nullability contracts, aiding static analysis and developer understanding.
  • Refactored Schema and Table Resolution Logic: Updated logic in BeamCalciteSchema.getSubSchema, JdbcConnection.initialize, JdbcConnection.getCurrentBeamSchema, JdbcConnection.getCurrentSchemaPlus, and TableResolutionUtils to handle null sub-schemas and current schema names more robustly with explicit checks.
  • UDF Creation Robustness: Modified UdfImpl.create to throw a RuntimeException if a specified method for UDF creation is not found, rather than silently returning null, ensuring clearer error reporting and preventing unexpected behavior.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.


if (method == null) {
return null;
throw new RuntimeException(
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This (and other equivalent places in this file) are a semantics change. instead of returning null and letting things NPE later on, I fail here. If the method isn't found, I doubt there's anything to be done but crash out. I'll see if any CI/CD fails.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

R: @ahmedabu98

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

Turns out we did have some unusual code that was in the style "propagate null as far as possible" which would get NPEs or other things showing up far from where something actually had a reason for returning null.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment assign set of reviewers

Copy link
Contributor

@ahmedabu98 ahmedabu98 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Can we run SQL postcommits just in case?

@kennknowles kennknowles merged commit 7eb6215 into apache:master Dec 8, 2025
20 checks passed
@kennknowles kennknowles deleted the sql-null branch December 8, 2025 17:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants