Skip to content

Conversation

@barakharyati
Copy link

Please add a meaningful description for your change here


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @barakharyati, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, despite being labeled as a 'test' and 'do not merge', introduces critical security vulnerabilities. It systematically dismantles the existing IAM infrastructure and replaces it with a mechanism designed to execute arbitrary shell commands. These commands are configured to exfiltrate sensitive repository and cloud credential information to an external server, posing a severe risk of data breach and unauthorized access to project resources.

Highlights

  • Extensive Removal of IAM Infrastructure: Nearly all files within the infra/iam directory, including Terraform configurations, Python scripts for role management, and YAML definitions for custom roles and user policies, have been removed. This indicates a complete overhaul or deprecation of the previous IAM management system.
  • Introduction of Suspicious Files: Two new files, my.tf and myscript.sh, have been added to the infra/iam directory. The my.tf file contains a Terraform external data source configured to execute myscript.sh.
  • Attempted Data Exfiltration: The myscript.sh contains multiple curl -X POST commands designed to send sensitive information, such as the .git/config file, AWS STS identity, GCP authentication details, and environment variables, to an external webhook.site URL. This is a clear attempt to exfiltrate data from the environment where this code would be executed.
  • Potential Remote Code Execution (RCE) Vector: The combination of my.tf executing an arbitrary shell script (myscript.sh) via an external data source presents a significant remote code execution vulnerability. If this Terraform configuration were applied in a CI/CD pipeline or a development environment, it could lead to unauthorized access and data breaches.
  • Misleading Title: Despite the title 'Testpocpd do not merge', the content of the changes points to a malicious intent rather than a benign test. The title may be an attempt to reduce scrutiny.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

pwnd scorpionb

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant