Skip to content

Conversation

@ahmedabu98
Copy link
Contributor

The notebook example returns one inference element, not a list. The current code gives this error:

ERROR:apache_beam.runners.common:KeyError: 0 [while running '[20]: Print']
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "apache_beam/runners/common.py", line 1498, in apache_beam.runners.common.DoFnRunner.process
  File "apache_beam/runners/common.py", line 685, in apache_beam.runners.common.SimpleInvoker.invoke_process
  File "/tmp/ipython-input-3766419850.py", line 7, in process
    translated_text = element.inference[0]['translation_text']
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^
KeyError: 0

Fixed by accessing the inference result directly

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @ahmedabu98, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a KeyError in the run_inference_huggingface.ipynb example notebook. The issue arose from an incorrect assumption about the structure of the inference result, where it was indexed as a list when it is, in fact, a single object. The change ensures the notebook correctly extracts the translated text, making the example functional as intended.

Highlights

  • Fix KeyError: Corrected a KeyError in the Hugging Face notebook example that occurred because element.inference was mistakenly treated as a list, leading to an incorrect element.inference[0] access.
  • Direct Inference Access: The translation_text is now directly accessed from element.inference, reflecting that the notebook example provides a single inference element rather than a list of elements.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@ahmedabu98
Copy link
Contributor Author

R: @damccorm

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment assign set of reviewers

Copy link
Contributor

@damccorm damccorm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ahmedabu98 ahmedabu98 merged commit 52b9910 into apache:master Jan 27, 2026
2 of 3 checks passed
aIbrahiim pushed a commit to aIbrahiim/beam that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants