Camel Karavan vs. Camel-K: Did I get it wrong? #1157
Closed
TheHandOfNOD
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 6 replies
-
Both options allow you to run integration application, build container and deploy to k8s. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
6 replies
-
Karavan is using vanilla standard Apache Camel (camel-main) and have no intention to do Camel K. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi guys,
I wanted to instrumentalize Karavan as an Tool to develop integrations which will then be deployed via Camel-K-Operator into my Kubernetes. This initiative was driven by the several documentation resources which I might have understood wrongly because what I figured out after installing and using Karavan is that Karavan actually only uses JBang and builds by itself a Dockerimage which is then used to create a container.
I would have thought that after "designing" my Route and combining all my Kamelets, somehow the "Kamel CLI" will be used to actually create a Camel-K integration.
So my questions are:
Unfortunately for my Setup it would not possible to use the VS-Code-Karavan-Plugin and use the Kamel-CLI manually to achieve this, but rather I have to use only Karavan.
Would love if someone could bring light into this topic for me.
Thx in advance.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions