-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
ui,server: add s390x architecture selection #10556
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Check plan for a created instance so retry can be done if it fails for a particular template Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
New zone-scope config added system.vm.preferred.architecture to allow deployment using specific architecture for system VMs including VRs. Refactor and added checks for deployements Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Based on changes from apache#10289 s390x support was added paritally with apache#10038 Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #10556 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 16.30% 16.29% -0.01%
+ Complexity 13440 13439 -1
============================================
Files 5674 5674
Lines 499213 499550 +337
Branches 60367 60410 +43
============================================
+ Hits 81383 81404 +21
- Misses 408759 409073 +314
- Partials 9071 9073 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
|
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
Description
Based on changes from #10289
s390x support was added paritally with #10038
Will rebase once #10289 is merged
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?