Skip to content

Conversation

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR...

Fixes: #8190

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 4.04%. Comparing base (f7b7339) to head (a50d09e).
Report is 139 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (f7b7339) and HEAD (a50d09e). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (f7b7339) HEAD (a50d09e)
unittests 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #8518       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     15.80%   4.04%   -11.77%     
============================================
  Files          5627     392     -5235     
  Lines        492294   32170   -460124     
  Branches      62198    5677    -56521     
============================================
- Hits          77824    1301    -76523     
+ Misses       405946   30721   -375225     
+ Partials       8524     148     -8376     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.04% <ø> (ø)
unittests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Jun 5, 2024
@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Jun 5, 2024
@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland force-pushed the ghi8190-allowManagedStorageMigration branch from 00775c1 to d8e1482 Compare June 5, 2024 12:25
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2024

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 11531

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland removed the request for review from abh1sar November 8, 2024 09:04
@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor Author

no longer relevant

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland deleted the ghi8190-allowManagedStorageMigration branch January 21, 2025 10:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Live Instance migration with storage getting failed

2 participants