Skip to content

Actions: apache/datafusion-python

Actions

Assign the issue via a `take` comment

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Show workflow options

Create status badge

Loading
take.yml
498 workflow runs
498 workflow runs

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

chore: Upgrade datafusion to version 49 Assign the issue via a `take` comment #298: Issue comment #1200 (comment) created by nuno-faria
1s
1s
chore: Upgrade datafusion to version 49 Assign the issue via a `take` comment #297: Issue comment #1200 (comment) created by timsaucer
1s
1s
build(deps): bump tokio from 1.46.1 to 1.47.0 Assign the issue via a `take` comment #296: Issue comment #1191 (comment) created by dependabot bot
1s
1s
Separable Python and Rust components Assign the issue via a `take` comment #295: Issue comment #1193 (comment) created by timsaucer
1s
1s
Separable Python and Rust components Assign the issue via a `take` comment #294: Issue comment #1193 (comment) created by awhyte
2s
2s
Separable Python and Rust components Assign the issue via a `take` comment #293: Issue comment #1193 (comment) created by timsaucer
1s
1s
Fix Python UDAF Accumulator Interface example to Properly Handle State and Updates with List[Array] Types Assign the issue via a `take` comment #292: Issue comment #1192 (comment) created by kosiew
1s
1s
Spike: evaluate if cuDF can be used with datafusion-python Assign the issue via a `take` comment #291: Issue comment #936 (comment) created by JigaoLuo
1s
1s
Spike: evaluate if cuDF can be used with datafusion-python Assign the issue via a `take` comment #290: Issue comment #936 (comment) created by milenkovicm
1s
1s
Spike: evaluate if cuDF can be used with datafusion-python Assign the issue via a `take` comment #289: Issue comment #936 (comment) created by milenkovicm
1s
1s
the python udaf example cannot print the result Assign the issue via a `take` comment #288: Issue comment #1190 (comment) created by kosiew
1s
1s
the python udaf example cannot print the result Assign the issue via a `take` comment #287: Issue comment #1190 (comment) created by l1t1
1s
1s
the python udaf example cannot print the result Assign the issue via a `take` comment #286: Issue comment #1190 (comment) created by kosiew
1s
1s
Serialize user defined functions and table providers via protobuf Assign the issue via a `take` comment #285: Issue comment #1181 (comment) created by milenkovicm
Skipped
Skipped
support FFI query result streams that do not pre-collect Assign the issue via a `take` comment #284: Issue comment #1011 (comment) created by djouallah
1s
1s
Serialize user defined functions and table providers via protobuf Assign the issue via a `take` comment #283: Issue comment #1181 (comment) created by colinmarc
1s
1s
Serialize user defined functions and table providers via protobuf Assign the issue via a `take` comment #282: Issue comment #1181 (comment) created by timsaucer
1s
1s
build(deps): bump tokio from 1.45.0 to 1.46.1 Assign the issue via a `take` comment #281: Issue comment #1180 (comment) created by dependabot bot
1s
1s
build(deps): bump object_store from 0.12.1 to 0.12.2 Assign the issue via a `take` comment #280: Issue comment #1149 (comment) created by dependabot bot
Skipped
Skipped
build(deps): bump arrow from 55.1.0 to 55.2.0 Assign the issue via a `take` comment #279: Issue comment #1174 (comment) created by dependabot bot
1s
1s
build(deps): bump mimalloc from 0.1.46 to 0.1.47 Assign the issue via a `take` comment #278: Issue comment #1165 (comment) created by dependabot bot
1s
1s
Serialize user defined functions and table providers via protobuf Assign the issue via a `take` comment #277: Issue comment #1181 (comment) created by timsaucer
1s
1s
Serialize user defined functions and table providers via protobuf Assign the issue via a `take` comment #276: Issue comment #1181 (comment) created by colinmarc
1s
1s
Add support for automatic join column deduplication in DataFrame joins Assign the issue via a `take` comment #275: Issue comment #1185 (comment) created by kosiew
1s
1s
Simplify Joins on Shared Column Name Assign the issue via a `take` comment #274: Issue comment #1173 (comment) created by kosiew
2s
2s