Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi @newsbreak-tonglin.
The copy.existing.pipeline may be cause the incorrect result in incremental read scenario, so we temporarily removed it.

Replies: 3 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by newsbreak-tonglin
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
3 participants