Skip to content

Commit f39515f

Browse files
Update src/routes/blog/post/appwrite-compared-to-supabase/+page.markdoc
Co-authored-by: Ebenezer Don <[email protected]>
1 parent cada900 commit f39515f

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

src/routes/blog/post/appwrite-compared-to-supabase/+page.markdoc

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ Appwrite offers native hosting as part of its all-in-one platform. That means yo
140140
*Differences:*
141141

142142
- Appwrite includes built-in hosting for static and dynamic sites via Appwrite Sites. Supabase does not offer frontend hosting. You must be dependent on third-party tools like Vercel or Netlify to host your application.
143-
- Appwrite Sites supports server-side rendering out of the box. Supabase depends on the capabilities of the third-party frontend host.
143+
- Appwrite Sites supports server-side rendering out of the box.
144144
- With Appwrite, developers can manage everything from frontend and backend to environments, deployments, and monitoring from a single control panel, while Supabase requires using multiple services and dashboards, increasing complexity.
145145

146146
## Support

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)