Improving unit tests

[aregtech]

          I also think that tests should not link to areg library, because that will cause us problems when creating mocks

Originally posted by @biwiki in #483 (comment)

[aregtech]

It will not a straight forward task, but for me tests should divided into multiple small ones, each test will contain test class(es), mock class(es) and a subset of classes in production code which is the areg library

To be honest, I’m having difficulty understanding how you envision the proposed code structure. Could you provide a small working example to demonstrate your approach? Using the existing unit tests as a basis for comparison would be perfectly fine. It is to compare the existing solution with your suggestion.

I’m absolutely open to improvements, but since I don’t fully grasp how you intend to organize or structure the code, I’m unable to provide a clear answer at this point.