Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
This turned out to be a bug. Thank you for bringing it to our attention. I will convert this discussion to an issue and submit a fix. We are in the final phases of preparing the 6.0 release, so it will be fixed in there. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am using AVD 5.7.2, and trying to generate custom, dynamic interface tags. However, some of the available keys/data_paths in the interface structured config seem to be ignored when creating the dynamic tags.
The intended application is to use specific interface tags to influence event/alert generation. In our campus environment, we want to alert on up/down events on specific port types (e.g. cameras, door access controllers). These port types may change over time, so defining a single tag for these ports would be ideal. For most port profiles, we explicitly set the [validate_state] attribute to true or false. This attribute seems well-suited for driving alerting behaviors.
In our AVD config, we have the following:
For testing, in cv_tags.py, ~ line 204 we added to review the structured config being evaluated:
This created log output like:
AVD successfully generates the interface tags Test_PortProfile and Test_portType. However, the Test_Alerting tag is not generated. Based on the log messages above, the validate_state data_path appears to be available.
Any suggestions on how to utilize the validate_state attribute to create an interface tag would be appreciated.
-Jason
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions