|
| 1 | +### Title |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Spectroscopy Development Busy Week |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +### Project Team |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +Kyle Westfall, Tim Pickering, Kelle Cruz, + |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +### Project Description |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +In Nov 2023, we held a workshop at NOIRLab to discuss spectroscopy |
| 12 | +software, identify needs, and begin projects to address them; see our |
| 13 | +[report](https://docs.google.com/document/d/10i3VXiQE2AUF7EVSJ8-jm1nTMaRhudYUVq409b3daOo/edit?usp=sharing). |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +Since then, we've held monthly meetings where we continue the discussion |
| 16 | +and touch base on progress in an effort to maintain momentum. Although |
| 17 | +this effort has led to a number of specutils/specreduce PRs (both at the |
| 18 | +workshop and since), it remains difficult for us as a group to find time |
| 19 | +to make significant progress on the development goals we identified. |
| 20 | +Here, we propose to provide travel support for the attendees of one busy |
| 21 | +week, focused on final development pushes toward specutils/specreduce |
| 22 | +PRs. The idea is that, instead of funding small fractions of an FTE for |
| 23 | +a few people, we can support short bursts of collective effort from many |
| 24 | +people. These efforts will directly support development priorities in |
| 25 | +specutils and specreduce. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +### Project / Work |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +The specific deliverables of this busy week are currently TBD. |
| 30 | +Possibilities include: |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + - Comparison of multiple wavelength-calibration algorithms pulled |
| 33 | + existing pipelines (DRAGONS, BANZAI, pypeit), and incorporated into |
| 34 | + specreduce. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | + - Similar work can be done for other algorithms, including sky |
| 37 | + subtraction, source extraction, coadding, flux calibration, etc. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | + - End-to-end example reduction performed using specreduce with a |
| 40 | + long-slit dataset |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | + - Addition of algorithms specific to fiber-based spectrographs |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +Significant planning will go into the timing of the workshop and each |
| 45 | +development goal. We expect to support 4-6 groups of 3-5 people each, |
| 46 | +with each group having a specific deliverable that can reasonably be |
| 47 | +achieved during the busy week. Broader discussions about priorities and |
| 48 | +longer terms goals are inevitable, but the focus of the week will be to |
| 49 | +complete a goal that directly benefits from a focused collective effort. |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +Comments and advice on how to actually achieve the above are welcome! |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +### Approximate Budget |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +We would aim to provide full travel support (airfare, hotel, meals, etc) |
| 56 | +for ~20 attendees for a 5 day workshop, hosted at one of the attendees |
| 57 | +home institutions (e.g., we could host it at UCO/UCSC in Santa Cruz). A |
| 58 | +rough estimate is ~$3000 per person, or ~$60k total. |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +### Period of Performance |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +This budget request is for a single 1 week meeting to happen within the |
| 63 | +year following when the project is approved. |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | + |
0 commit comments