Poor example

[Gerriko]

I've just downloaded your library but found your example to be very difficult to make sense.

In my opinion, it is better to create different examples to highlight specific functions rather than try and bundle all sorts into one example.

[avandalen]

Dear Gerriki Thank you for your advise. I understand it, but I have no time to improve the examples. Maybe you can help? If you want you can edit the examples yourselve on github for me. I can let you contribute. Albert From: Gerriko IOT Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 7:41 PM To: avandalen/avdweb_SAMDtimer Cc: Subscribed Subject: [avandalen/avdweb_SAMDtimer] Poor example (#1) I've just downloaded your library but found your example to be very difficult to make sense. In my opinion, it is better to create different examples to highlight specific functions rather than try and bundle all sorts into one example. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[Gerriko]

Hello Albert Thank you for your reply. Yes, I should be able to help once I get to grips with the samd documentation - it was only yesterday that I needed to use a timer for the first time in an Arduino MKR project I am working on. So I am still getting to grips with the specific requirements of samd. I had a similar issue with Adafruit's zerotimer library and they also replied back to me with a similar suggestion. Now, if I am correct in my understanding of your website documentation, your library used to (or still does) require this library. So I am wondering whether it is better served for me to work with Adafruit on the Adafruit library to make that better and use your good work as guidance. This way you can be relieved of the onus to maintain your library and the community get a more comprehensive option via zerotimer. Just a thought, for now, although it may transpire that it is better to keep separate. Will think about it over Christmas break and put this in my work schedule for 2019. Best regards Colin

…

On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 08:23, Albert van Dalen ***@***.***> wrote: Dear Gerriki Thank you for your advise. I understand it, but I have no time to improve the examples. Maybe you can help? If you want you can edit the examples yourselve on github for me. I can let you contribute. Albert From: Gerriko IOT Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 7:41 PM To: avandalen/avdweb_SAMDtimer Cc: Subscribed Subject: [avandalen/avdweb_SAMDtimer] Poor example (#1) I've just downloaded your library but found your example to be very difficult to make sense. In my opinion, it is better to create different examples to highlight specific functions rather than try and bundle all sorts into one example. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALW8AhvNhJLTAuYpg0Oa2YaLHO4GrbhIks5u7JqYgaJpZM4Zctu1> .

[avandalen]

Hello Colin My timer is just an improvement / extention of the Adafruit lib, it has a easy to use interface, that is the only difference. From: Gerriko IOT Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 10:43 AM To: avandalen/avdweb_SAMDtimer Cc: Albert van Dalen ; Comment Subject: Re: [avandalen/avdweb_SAMDtimer] Poor example (#1) Hello Albert Thank you for your reply. Yes, I should be able to help once I get to grips with the samd documentation - it was only yesterday that I needed to use a timer for the first time in an Arduino MKR project I am working on. So I am still getting to grips with the specific requirements of samd. I had a similar issue with Adafruit's zerotimer library and they also replied back to me with a similar suggestion. Now, if I am correct in my understanding of your website documentation, your library used to (or still does) require this library. So I am wondering whether it is better served for me to work with Adafruit on the Adafruit library to make that better and use your good work as guidance. This way you can be relieved of the onus to maintain your library and the community get a more comprehensive option via zerotimer. Just a thought, for now, although it may transpire that it is better to keep separate. Will think about it over Christmas break and put this in my work schedule for 2019. Best regards Colin

On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 08:23, Albert van Dalen ***@***.***> wrote: Dear Gerriki Thank you for your advise. I understand it, but I have no time to improve the examples. Maybe you can help? If you want you can edit the examples yourselve on github for me. I can let you contribute. Albert From: Gerriko IOT Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 7:41 PM To: avandalen/avdweb_SAMDtimer Cc: Subscribed Subject: [avandalen/avdweb_SAMDtimer] Poor example (#1) I've just downloaded your library but found your example to be very difficult to make sense. In my opinion, it is better to create different examples to highlight specific functions rather than try and bundle all sorts into one example. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALW8AhvNhJLTAuYpg0Oa2YaLHO4GrbhIks5u7JqYgaJpZM4Zctu1> .

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.