Ezcoo 4K 120Hz VRR CEC HDMI 2.1 Splitter EZ-SP12H21

[awawa-dev]

I'm curious about your experiences. I just received it and it turns out that CEC works (it's supposedly unidirectional). In the older EZ-SP12H2 model, CEC didn't work. In my case, RPI4 is connected to the splitter input and Output1 to the LG TV. HyperHDR recognizes commands when the TV is turned on/off and the LG remote control buttons.

[litui]

CEC works fine to output 1 on this splitter. Having taken my SP12H21 apart, done some probing, and microsoldered a lead to pin 13, I can tell you it's a straight-through connection between pin 13 on the input and pin 13 on output 1, so there's no directionality.

I've got cec-gpio working on my RPi 4 though sadly it doesn't seem to work with libcec in bookworm (only kernel-native cec-ctl). That's what prompted my efforts in #1005.

[awawa-dev]

I tested the Raspberry Pi bookworm OS and fortunately CEC still works. Good to know there is a direct connection between pins 13. The manufacturer's description indicated that they used a diode so it is unidirectional.

[litui]

As for the bookworm issues I'm seeing that might just be related to using cec-gpio on the RPi since I don't have a Pulse-Eight dongle.

[awawa-dev]

EZ-SP12H21 description says "Does not support Sonos-ARC/e-ARC CEC Bi-directional." But maybe it's a mistake and they missed a "." between a "e-ARC" and "CEC"? ;-)

[litui]

Interestingly, I have a Sonos eARC setup, but it goes through my TV's eARC port. Seems to be working just fine...

[litui]

Confirmed: there is not a diode between the Input and Output 1 on pin 13. It is a direct connection (And there is no CEC on Output 2, as far as I can tell).

I took my SP12H21 apart again today, tested continuity on pin 13 in both directions, and soldered a lead to pin 13 on the input so I could confirm it all works by monitoring each pin using cec-ctl on the RPi. The below screenshot shows identical messages at both Input and Output.

[awawa-dev]

So this is probably what they meant, that it is not bi-directional: there is no CEC on output 2. It should be obvious since the master device is always output 1, but they described it in such a way that it is not entirely clear what they mean.

[JFingerle]

I needed to solder a wire from input pin 13 to output (1) pin 13. The print on my pcb is "SP12H2 V0.4 2424".

[Oli-70]

Can someone confirm that it works?

[gurpreetsingh00885]

@awawa-dev does this splitter also support LLDV like sp12h2?

[awawa-dev]

I highly doubt that the cable has any involvement in this particular situation.

[AstaRom]

Otherwise we will have to look for custom firmware I guess which may not even exist...

• Alternative Devices for Enabling LLDV
• xnappo / ez_dv_edid_fw

[gurpreetsingh00885]

Fabulous!

[gurpreetsingh00885]

@awawa-dev I have this capture card:

https://amzn.in/d/g19NFbQ

It supports 4k60 output to my TV when using my fire tv stick (confirmed myself) and macbook.

I also opened it up and the chip says it is ms2131.

4k60 must mean it is HDMI 2.0. I am trying to update the EDID for the firmware on my card to make 1080p 120 HDR show up on my PS5 (experimenting till I recieve SP12H21).
For that I believe I need 1080p120 HDR 4:4:4.
What I have tried is backup my firmware, open it in a hex editor, find the edid using the header and then copy 256 bytes. Convert and save into a .bin file. Then open that in AWEDID editor and modify stuff in there. Then I dump the EDID to the backed up firmware using a tool called ms213x-rename that I found on GitHub.
However that firmware breaks the capture card completely and I have to flash the clean backup again.

Am I missing anything?
Can you please be kind enough to share how you modify firmware?

Right now my goal is for 1080p HDR 120FPS to just show up for my ps5.

[awawa-dev]

http://en.macrosilicon.com/info.asp?base_id=2&third_id=76 I can see 1.4b bandwidth support only. And 4:4:4 is the most bandwidth hungry encoding probably way to much for 1080p120 and this grabber. Firmware needs signing/CRC and I've done it almost 2 years ago and since the result was satisfying I'm done with it.