Skip to content

Commit 331d244

Browse files
author
AWS
committed
AWS Control Catalog Update: Minor documentation updates to the content of ImplementationDetails object part of the Control Catalog GetControl API
1 parent 4f52728 commit 331d244

File tree

2 files changed

+7
-1
lines changed

2 files changed

+7
-1
lines changed
Lines changed: 6 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
1+
{
2+
"type": "feature",
3+
"category": "AWS Control Catalog",
4+
"contributor": "",
5+
"description": "Minor documentation updates to the content of ImplementationDetails object part of the Control Catalog GetControl API"
6+
}

services/controlcatalog/src/main/resources/codegen-resources/service-2.json

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@
384384
"documentation":"<p>A string that describes a control's implementation type.</p>"
385385
}
386386
},
387-
"documentation":"<p>An object that describes the implementation type for a control.</p> <p>Our <code>ImplementationDetails</code> <code>Type</code> format has three required segments:</p> <ul> <li> <p> <code>SERVICE-PROVIDER::SERVICE-NAME::RESOURCE-NAME</code> </p> </li> </ul> <p>For example, <code>AWS::Config::ConfigRule</code> <b>or</b> <code>AWS::SecurityHub::SecurityControl</code> resources have the format with three required segments.</p> <p>Our <code>ImplementationDetails</code> <code>Type</code> format has an optional fourth segment, which is present for applicable implementation types. The format is as follows: </p> <ul> <li> <p> <code>SERVICE-PROVIDER::SERVICE-NAME::RESOURCE-NAME::RESOURCE-TYPE-DESCRIPTION</code> </p> </li> </ul> <p>For example, <code>AWS::Organizations::Policy::SERVICE_CONTROL_POLICY</code> <b>or</b> <code>AWS::CloudFormation::Type::HOOK</code> have the format with four segments.</p> <p>Although the format is similar, the values for the <code>Type</code> field do not match any Amazon Web Services CloudFormation values, and we do not use CloudFormation to implement these controls.</p>"
387+
"documentation":"<p>An object that describes the implementation type for a control.</p> <p>Our <code>ImplementationDetails</code> <code>Type</code> format has three required segments:</p> <ul> <li> <p> <code>SERVICE-PROVIDER::SERVICE-NAME::RESOURCE-NAME</code> </p> </li> </ul> <p>For example, <code>AWS::Config::ConfigRule</code> <b>or</b> <code>AWS::SecurityHub::SecurityControl</code> resources have the format with three required segments.</p> <p>Our <code>ImplementationDetails</code> <code>Type</code> format has an optional fourth segment, which is present for applicable implementation types. The format is as follows: </p> <ul> <li> <p> <code>SERVICE-PROVIDER::SERVICE-NAME::RESOURCE-NAME::RESOURCE-TYPE-DESCRIPTION</code> </p> </li> </ul> <p>For example, <code>AWS::Organizations::Policy::SERVICE_CONTROL_POLICY</code> <b>or</b> <code>AWS::CloudFormation::Type::HOOK</code> have the format with four segments.</p> <p>Although the format is similar, the values for the <code>Type</code> field do not match any Amazon Web Services CloudFormation values.</p>"
388388
},
389389
"ImplementationType":{
390390
"type":"string",

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)