Provide Presigned URL Support for DeleteObjectRequest with presignDeleteObject

[mofeejegi]

Describe the feature

According to the docs, the SDK for Kotlin currently supports presigning the following API operations with the S3Client:

• GetObject -> presignGetObject
• PutObject -> presignPutObject
• UploadPart -> presignUploadPart

There is noticeably no presignDeleteObject but the functionality is present in the AWS Java v2 SDK, added here: aws/aws-sdk-java-v2#4313

Is your feature request related to a problem?

I would like to be able to create a DeleteObjectRequest and presign it with a corresponding presignDeleteObject.

Proposed Solution

No response

Describe alternative solutions or features you've considered

Alternatively, I used the S3Presigner from the AWS SDK for Java v2 to presign the DeleteObjectRequest. Ideally, it would be preferable to not use a Java SDK in a Kotlin project, but the JVM interoperability still works fine.

Another solution would be to consider exposing an agnostic S3Presigner that can be applied to any Http Operation, but I still appreciate the way the API currently handles it.

Acknowledge

• I may be able to implement this feature request

AWS SDK for Kotlin version

1.4.96

Platform (JVM/JS/Native)

JVM

Operating system and version

MacOS

[github-actions]

⚠️COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING⚠️

Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.
If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.

[lauzadis]

Thanks for the feature request! I merged a PR which adds support for presigning DeleteObject requests. It will be included in today's release. Check it out and let me know if you have any problems.

[lauzadis]

I like the idea of an agnostic presigner, but this would involve broad changes to the way we've implemented presigning in the SDK. If it's something you're really interested in, consider opening a separate feature request. Thanks!

[mofeejegi]

Thanks a lot!
Of course, no need to worry about the agnostic presigner, I still like the API as it is now.