Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

S3 has a 63 character limit on bucket names. The object key has a much longer limit, not sure what it is off the top of my head. S3 didn't always have the 63 limit but it has been a decade or so since it was put in place. I don't know the full history but I know it had to deal with getting the bucket name being dns compatible as there is a preference to use host style vs path style addressing of the bucket.

Replies: 3 comments 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@steve-wark
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by normj
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants