Skip to content

Commit d683879

Browse files
AWS SDK for RubyNobody
authored andcommitted
Updated service API models for release.
1 parent 52f2af4 commit d683879

File tree

19 files changed

+5342
-3879
lines changed

19 files changed

+5342
-3879
lines changed

CHANGELOG.md

Lines changed: 16 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,22 @@
11
Unreleased Changes
22
------------------
33

4+
* Feature - Aws::DynamoDB - Updated the documentation for Amazon DynamoDB.
5+
6+
* Feature - Aws::ECS - Updated the API, and documentation for Amazon EC2 Container Service.
7+
8+
* Feature - Aws::SES - Updated the API, and documentation for Amazon Simple Email Service.
9+
10+
* Feature - Aws::GuardDuty - Updated the API, and documentation for Amazon GuardDuty.
11+
12+
* Feature - Aws::CloudWatchLogs - Updated the documentation for Amazon CloudWatch Logs.
13+
14+
* Feature - Aws::MediaConnect - Updated the API, and documentation for AWS MediaConnect.
15+
16+
* Feature - Aws::Organizations - Updated the API, and documentation for AWS Organizations.
17+
18+
* Feature - Aws::SSM - Updated the API, and documentation for Amazon Simple Systems Manager (SSM).
19+
420
2.11.288 (2019-06-05)
521
------------------
622

aws-sdk-core/apis/dynamodb/2012-08-10/docs-2.json

Lines changed: 8 additions & 8 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1086,13 +1086,13 @@
10861086
"KMSMasterKeyArn": {
10871087
"base": null,
10881088
"refs": {
1089-
"SSEDescription$KMSMasterKeyArn": "<p>The KMS master key ARN used for the KMS encryption.</p>"
1089+
"SSEDescription$KMSMasterKeyArn": "<p>The KMS customer master key (CMK) ARN used for the KMS encryption.</p>"
10901090
}
10911091
},
10921092
"KMSMasterKeyId": {
10931093
"base": null,
10941094
"refs": {
1095-
"SSESpecification$KMSMasterKeyId": "<p>The KMS Master Key (CMK) which should be used for the KMS encryption. To specify a CMK, use its key ID, Amazon Resource Name (ARN), alias name, or alias ARN. Note that you should only provide this parameter if the key is different from the default DynamoDB KMS Master Key alias/aws/dynamodb.</p>"
1095+
"SSESpecification$KMSMasterKeyId": "<p>The KMS Customer Master Key (CMK) which should be used for the KMS encryption. To specify a CMK, use its key ID, Amazon Resource Name (ARN), alias name, or alias ARN. Note that you should only provide this parameter if the key is different from the default DynamoDB Customer Master Key alias/aws/dynamodb.</p>"
10961096
}
10971097
},
10981098
"Key": {
@@ -1590,7 +1590,7 @@
15901590
}
15911591
},
15921592
"RequestLimitExceeded": {
1593-
"base": "<p>Throughput exceeds the current throughput limit for your account. Please contact AWS Support at <a href=\"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/https:/aws.amazon.com/support\">AWS Support</a> to request a limit increase.</p>",
1593+
"base": "<p>Throughput exceeds the current throughput limit for your account. Please contact AWS Support at <a href=\"https://aws.amazon.com/support\">AWS Support</a> to request a limit increase.</p>",
15941594
"refs": {
15951595
}
15961596
},
@@ -1696,7 +1696,7 @@
16961696
"SSEEnabled": {
16971697
"base": null,
16981698
"refs": {
1699-
"SSESpecification$Enabled": "<p>Indicates whether server-side encryption is enabled (true) or disabled (false) on the table. If enabled (true), server-side encryption type is set to <code>KMS</code>. If disabled (false) or not specified, server-side encryption is set to AWS owned CMK.</p>"
1699+
"SSESpecification$Enabled": "<p>Indicates whether server-side encryption is done using an AWS managed CMK or an AWS owned CMK. If enabled (true), server-side encryption type is set to <code>KMS</code> and an AWS managed CMK is used (AWS KMS charges apply). If disabled (false) or not specified, server-side encryption is set to AWS owned CMK.</p>"
17001700
}
17011701
},
17021702
"SSESpecification": {
@@ -1709,14 +1709,14 @@
17091709
"SSEStatus": {
17101710
"base": null,
17111711
"refs": {
1712-
"SSEDescription$Status": "<p>The current state of server-side encryption:</p> <ul> <li> <p> <code>ENABLING</code> - Server-side encryption is being enabled.</p> </li> <li> <p> <code>ENABLED</code> - Server-side encryption is enabled.</p> </li> <li> <p> <code>DISABLING</code> - Server-side encryption is being disabled.</p> </li> <li> <p> <code>DISABLED</code> - Server-side encryption is disabled.</p> </li> <li> <p> <code>UPDATING</code> - Server-side encryption is being updated.</p> </li> </ul>"
1712+
"SSEDescription$Status": "<p>Represents the current state of server-side encryption. The only supported values are:</p> <ul> <li> <p> <code>ENABLED</code> - Server-side encryption is enabled.</p> </li> <li> <p> <code>UPDATING</code> - Server-side encryption is being updated.</p> </li> </ul>"
17131713
}
17141714
},
17151715
"SSEType": {
17161716
"base": null,
17171717
"refs": {
1718-
"SSEDescription$SSEType": "<p>Server-side encryption type:</p> <ul> <li> <p> <code>AES256</code> - Server-side encryption which uses the AES256 algorithm (not applicable).</p> </li> <li> <p> <code>KMS</code> - Server-side encryption which uses AWS Key Management Service. Key is stored in your account and is managed by AWS KMS (KMS charges apply).</p> </li> </ul>",
1719-
"SSESpecification$SSEType": "<p>Server-side encryption type:</p> <ul> <li> <p> <code>AES256</code> - Server-side encryption which uses the AES256 algorithm (not applicable).</p> </li> <li> <p> <code>KMS</code> - Server-side encryption which uses AWS Key Management Service. Key is stored in your account and is managed by AWS KMS (KMS charges apply).</p> </li> </ul>"
1718+
"SSEDescription$SSEType": "<p>Server-side encryption type. The only supported value is:</p> <ul> <li> <p> <code>KMS</code> - Server-side encryption which uses AWS Key Management Service. Key is stored in your account and is managed by AWS KMS (KMS charges apply).</p> </li> </ul>",
1719+
"SSESpecification$SSEType": "<p>Server-side encryption type. The only supported value is:</p> <ul> <li> <p> <code>KMS</code> - Server-side encryption which uses AWS Key Management Service. Key is stored in your account and is managed by AWS KMS (KMS charges apply).</p> </li> </ul>"
17201720
}
17211721
},
17221722
"ScalarAttributeType": {
@@ -2063,7 +2063,7 @@
20632063
}
20642064
},
20652065
"TransactionCanceledException": {
2066-
"base": "<p>The entire transaction request was rejected.</p> <p>DynamoDB rejects a <code>TransactWriteItems</code> request under the following circumstances:</p> <ul> <li> <p>A condition in one of the condition expressions is not met.</p> </li> <li> <p>A table in the <code>TransactWriteItems</code> request is in a different account or region.</p> </li> <li> <p>More than one action in the <code>TransactWriteItems</code> operation targets the same item.</p> </li> <li> <p>There is insufficient provisioned capacity for the transaction to be completed.</p> </li> <li> <p>An item size becomes too large (larger than 400 KB), or a local secondary index (LSI) becomes too large, or a similar validation error occurs because of changes made by the transaction.</p> </li> <li> <p>There is a user error, such as an invalid data format.</p> </li> </ul> <p>DynamoDB rejects a <code>TransactGetItems</code> request under the following circumstances:</p> <ul> <li> <p>There is an ongoing <code>TransactGetItems</code> operation that conflicts with a concurrent <code>PutItem</code>, <code>UpdateItem</code>, <code>DeleteItem</code> or <code>TransactWriteItems</code> request. In this case the <code>TransactGetItems</code> operation fails with a <code>TransactionCanceledException</code>.</p> </li> <li> <p>A table in the <code>TransactGetItems</code> request is in a different account or region.</p> </li> <li> <p>There is insufficient provisioned capacity for the transaction to be completed.</p> </li> <li> <p>There is a user error, such as an invalid data format.</p> </li> </ul>",
2066+
"base": "<p>The entire transaction request was canceled.</p> <p>DynamoDB cancels a <code>TransactWriteItems</code> request under the following circumstances:</p> <ul> <li> <p>A condition in one of the condition expressions is not met.</p> </li> <li> <p>A table in the <code>TransactWriteItems</code> request is in a different account or region.</p> </li> <li> <p>More than one action in the <code>TransactWriteItems</code> operation targets the same item.</p> </li> <li> <p>There is insufficient provisioned capacity for the transaction to be completed.</p> </li> <li> <p>An item size becomes too large (larger than 400 KB), or a local secondary index (LSI) becomes too large, or a similar validation error occurs because of changes made by the transaction.</p> </li> <li> <p>There is a user error, such as an invalid data format.</p> </li> </ul> <p>DynamoDB cancels a <code>TransactGetItems</code> request under the following circumstances:</p> <ul> <li> <p>There is an ongoing <code>TransactGetItems</code> operation that conflicts with a concurrent <code>PutItem</code>, <code>UpdateItem</code>, <code>DeleteItem</code> or <code>TransactWriteItems</code> request. In this case the <code>TransactGetItems</code> operation fails with a <code>TransactionCanceledException</code>.</p> </li> <li> <p>A table in the <code>TransactGetItems</code> request is in a different account or region.</p> </li> <li> <p>There is insufficient provisioned capacity for the transaction to be completed.</p> </li> <li> <p>There is a user error, such as an invalid data format.</p> </li> </ul> <note> <p>If using Java, DynamoDB lists the cancellation reasons on the <code>CancellationReasons</code> property. This property is not set for other languages. Transaction cancellation reasons are ordered in the order of requested items, if an item has no error it will have <code>NONE</code> code and <code>Null</code> message.</p> </note> <p>Cancellation reason codes and possible error messages:</p> <ul> <li> <p>No Errors:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Code: <code>NONE</code> </p> </li> <li> <p>Message: <code>null</code> </p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>Conditional Check Failed:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Code: <code>ConditionalCheckFailed</code> </p> </li> <li> <p>Message: The conditional request failed. </p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>Item Collection Size Limit Exceeded:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Code: <code>ItemCollectionSizeLimitExceeded</code> </p> </li> <li> <p>Message: Collection size exceeded.</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>Transaction Conflict:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Code: <code>TransactionConflict</code> </p> </li> <li> <p>Message: Transaction is ongoing for the item.</p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>Provisioned Throughput Exceeded:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Code: <code>ProvisionedThroughputExceeded</code> </p> </li> <li> <p>Messages: </p> <ul> <li> <p>The level of configured provisioned throughput for the table was exceeded. Consider increasing your provisioning level with the UpdateTable API.</p> <note> <p>This Message is received when provisioned throughput is exceeded is on a provisioned DynamoDB table.</p> </note> </li> <li> <p>The level of configured provisioned throughput for one or more global secondary indexes of the table was exceeded. Consider increasing your provisioning level for the under-provisioned global secondary indexes with the UpdateTable API.</p> <note> <p>This message is returned when provisioned throughput is exceeded is on a provisioned GSI.</p> </note> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>Throttling Error:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Code: <code>ThrottlingError</code> </p> </li> <li> <p>Messages: </p> <ul> <li> <p>Throughput exceeds the current capacity of your table or index. DynamoDB is automatically scaling your table or index so please try again shortly. If exceptions persist, check if you have a hot key: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/bp-partition-key-design.html.</p> <note> <p>This message is returned when writes get throttled on an On-Demand table as DynamoDB is automatically scaling the table.</p> </note> </li> <li> <p>Throughput exceeds the current capacity for one or more global secondary indexes. DynamoDB is automatically scaling your index so please try again shortly.</p> <note> <p>This message is returned when when writes get throttled on an On-Demand GSI as DynamoDB is automatically scaling the GSI.</p> </note> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>Validation Error:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Code: <code>ValidationError</code> </p> </li> <li> <p>Messages: </p> <ul> <li> <p>One or more parameter values were invalid.</p> </li> <li> <p>The update expression attempted to update the secondary index key beyond allowed size limits.</p> </li> <li> <p>The update expression attempted to update the secondary index key to unsupported type.</p> </li> <li> <p>An operand in the update expression has an incorrect data type.</p> </li> <li> <p>Item size to update has exceeded the maximum allowed size.</p> </li> <li> <p>Number overflow. Attempting to store a number with magnitude larger than supported range.</p> </li> <li> <p>Type mismatch for attribute to update.</p> </li> <li> <p>Nesting Levels have exceeded supported limits.</p> </li> <li> <p>The document path provided in the update expression is invalid for update.</p> </li> <li> <p>The provided expression refers to an attribute that does not exist in the item.</p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul>",
20672067
"refs": {
20682068
}
20692069
},

aws-sdk-core/apis/ecs/2014-11-13/api-2.json

Lines changed: 36 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -534,6 +534,21 @@
534534
{"shape":"ClusterNotFoundException"}
535535
]
536536
},
537+
"SubmitAttachmentStateChanges":{
538+
"name":"SubmitAttachmentStateChanges",
539+
"http":{
540+
"method":"POST",
541+
"requestUri":"/"
542+
},
543+
"input":{"shape":"SubmitAttachmentStateChangesRequest"},
544+
"output":{"shape":"SubmitAttachmentStateChangesResponse"},
545+
"errors":[
546+
{"shape":"ServerException"},
547+
{"shape":"ClientException"},
548+
{"shape":"AccessDeniedException"},
549+
{"shape":"InvalidParameterException"}
550+
]
551+
},
537552
"SubmitContainerStateChange":{
538553
"name":"SubmitContainerStateChange",
539554
"http":{
@@ -966,6 +981,7 @@
966981
"remainingResources":{"shape":"Resources"},
967982
"registeredResources":{"shape":"Resources"},
968983
"status":{"shape":"String"},
984+
"statusReason":{"shape":"String"},
969985
"agentConnected":{"shape":"Boolean"},
970986
"runningTasksCount":{"shape":"Integer"},
971987
"pendingTasksCount":{"shape":"Integer"},
@@ -988,7 +1004,10 @@
9881004
"type":"string",
9891005
"enum":[
9901006
"ACTIVE",
991-
"DRAINING"
1007+
"DRAINING",
1008+
"REGISTERING",
1009+
"DEREGISTERING",
1010+
"REGISTRATION_FAILED"
9921011
]
9931012
},
9941013
"ContainerInstances":{
@@ -2198,7 +2217,8 @@
21982217
"enum":[
21992218
"serviceLongArnFormat",
22002219
"taskLongArnFormat",
2201-
"containerInstanceLongArnFormat"
2220+
"containerInstanceLongArnFormat",
2221+
"awsvpcTrunking"
22022222
]
22032223
},
22042224
"Settings":{
@@ -2274,6 +2294,20 @@
22742294
"key":{"shape":"String"},
22752295
"value":{"shape":"String"}
22762296
},
2297+
"SubmitAttachmentStateChangesRequest":{
2298+
"type":"structure",
2299+
"required":["attachments"],
2300+
"members":{
2301+
"cluster":{"shape":"String"},
2302+
"attachments":{"shape":"AttachmentStateChanges"}
2303+
}
2304+
},
2305+
"SubmitAttachmentStateChangesResponse":{
2306+
"type":"structure",
2307+
"members":{
2308+
"acknowledgment":{"shape":"String"}
2309+
}
2310+
},
22772311
"SubmitContainerStateChangeRequest":{
22782312
"type":"structure",
22792313
"members":{

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)