chore: improve PR template (#171)

## Description

### Why is this change being made?

1. Standardize the PR process by adding reviewee and reviewer checklists
that ensure consistent validation steps, improve code quality, and make
reviews more efficient.


### What is changing?

1. Setting up change review template for the repo.


### Related Links
- **Issue #, if available**: N/A

---

## Testing

### How was this tested?

1. Validated the MD preview. The template needs to be merged to the main
branch to be auto applied.

### When testing locally, provide testing artifact(s):

1. N/A

---

## Reviewee Checklist

**Update the checklist after submitting the PR**

- [x] I have reviewed, tested and understand all changes
  *If not, why:*
- [x] I have filled out the Description and Testing sections above
  *If not, why:*
- [x] Build and Unit tests are passing
  *If not, why:* Just an MD update. No code changes.
- [x] Unit test coverage check is passing
  *If not, why:* Just an MD update. No code changes.
- [ ] Integration tests pass locally
  *If not, why:* Just an MD update. No code changes.
- [ ] I have updated integration tests (if needed)
  *If not, why:* Just an MD update. No code changes.
- [x] I have ensured no sensitive information is leaking (i.e., no
logging of sensitive fields, or otherwise)
  *If not, why:* 
- [ ] I have added explanatory comments for complex logic, new
classes/methods and new tests
  *If not, why:* Just an MD update. No code changes.
- [ ] I have updated README/documentation (if needed)
  *If not, why:* No relevant doc changes required.
- [ ] I have clearly called out breaking changes (if any)
  *If not, why:* Just an MD update. No code changes.

---

## Reviewer Checklist

**All reviewers please ensure the following are true before reviewing:**

- Reviewee checklist has been accurately filled out
- Code changes align with stated purpose in description
- Test coverage adequately validates the changes

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made
under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Author: i-am-SR

.crux_template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+## Description
+
+### Why is this change being made?
+
+1. 
+
+
+### What is changing?
+
+1. 
+
+
+### Related Links
+- **Ticket/Issue**: 
+- **Design Doc**: 
+
+---
+
+## Revision History
+
+<!-- Create a new entry in this section when publishing new revisions. Leave blank for Revision 1. -->
+
+### Revision X:
+
+#### What has changed since the last revision?
+
+1. 
+
+---
+
+## Testing
+
+### How was this tested?
+
+1. 
+
+
+### When testing locally, provide testing artifact(s):
+
+1. 
+
+---
+
+## Reviewee Checklist
+
+**Update the checklist on each revision:**
+
+- [ ] I have reviewed, tested and understand all changes
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have filled out the Description and Testing sections above
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have updated the Revision History section (if publishing a new revision)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Build and Unit tests are passing
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Unit test coverage for changes is adequate (> 80%)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Integration tests pass locally
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have updated integration tests (if needed)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have ensured no sensitive information is leaking (i.e., no logging of sensitive fields, or otherwise)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have added explanatory comments for complex logic, new classes/methods and new tests
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have updated README/documentation (if needed)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have clearly called out breaking changes (if any)
+
+  *If not, why:*
+
+---
+
+## Reviewer Checklist
+
+**All reviewers please ensure the following are true before reviewing each revision:**
+
+- Reviewee checklist has been accurately filled out
+- Code changes align with stated purpose in description
+- Test coverage adequately validates the changes

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

@@ -1,6 +1,67 @@
-*Issue #, if available:*
+## Description
 
-*Description of changes:*
+### Why is this change being made?
 
+1.
+
+
+### What is changing?
+
+1.
+
+
+### Related Links
+- **Issue #, if available**:
+
+---
+
+## Testing
+
+### How was this tested?
+
+1. 
+
+### When testing locally, provide testing artifact(s):
+
+1. 
+
+---
+
+## Reviewee Checklist
+
+**Update the checklist after submitting the PR**
+
+- [ ] I have reviewed, tested and understand all changes
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have filled out the Description and Testing sections above
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Build and Unit tests are passing
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Unit test coverage check is passing
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] Integration tests pass locally
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have updated integration tests (if needed)
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have ensured no sensitive information is leaking (i.e., no logging of sensitive fields, or otherwise)
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have added explanatory comments for complex logic, new classes/methods and new tests
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have updated README/documentation (if needed)
+  *If not, why:*
+- [ ] I have clearly called out breaking changes (if any)
+  *If not, why:*
+
+---
+
+## Reviewer Checklist
+
+**All reviewers please ensure the following are true before reviewing:**
+
+- Reviewee checklist has been accurately filled out
+- Code changes align with stated purpose in description
+- Test coverage adequately validates the changes
+
+---
 
 By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.