-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 751
build(lint): add no-array-for-each and migrate existing cases.
#6281
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
0f667ae to
c2de1a4
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
/runIntegrationTests |
justinmk3
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2024
Contributor
justinmk3
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
karanA-aws
pushed a commit
to karanA-aws/aws-toolkit-vscode
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
## Problem Many bugs, and confusing behavior stem from developers using an async function within a forEach. This is almost always not desired. Additionally, `forEach` can lead to bloated implementations when other methods like `some`, `find`, `reduce`, or `flatMap` are more applicable. According to https://github.com/sindresorhus/eslint-plugin-unicorn/blob/main/docs/rules/no-array-for-each.md It is also faster with `for ... of`. ## Solution - Add lint rule: https://github.com/sindresorhus/eslint-plugin-unicorn/blob/main/docs/rules/no-array-for-each.md - Migrate existing cases with `eslint CLI --fix` (75% of cases). - For remaining cases, mark as exception.
s7ab059789
pushed a commit
to s7ab059789/aws-toolkit-vscode
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2025
Many bugs, and confusing behavior stem from developers using an async function within a forEach. This is almost always not desired. Additionally, `forEach` can lead to bloated implementations when other methods like `some`, `find`, `reduce`, or `flatMap` are more applicable. According to https://github.com/sindresorhus/eslint-plugin-unicorn/blob/main/docs/rules/no-array-for-each.md It is also faster with `for ... of`. - Add lint rule: https://github.com/sindresorhus/eslint-plugin-unicorn/blob/main/docs/rules/no-array-for-each.md - Migrate existing cases with `eslint CLI --fix` (75% of cases). - For remaining cases, mark as exception.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Many bugs, and confusing behavior stem from developers using an async function within a forEach. This is almost always not desired. Additionally,
forEachcan lead to bloated implementations when other methods likesome,find,reduce, orflatMapare more applicable.According to https://github.com/sindresorhus/eslint-plugin-unicorn/blob/main/docs/rules/no-array-for-each.md It is also faster with
for ... of.Solution
feature/xbranches will not be squash-merged at release time.