Skip to content

Conversation

@jguoamz
Copy link
Contributor

@jguoamz jguoamz commented Apr 10, 2025

Problem

  • Add ToolUse to history even if input is missing
    • It may be missing in case when we cannot parse the input

Solution

  • Still add the toolUse to history to allow LLM to auto-correct itself

  • Treat all work as PUBLIC. Private feature/x branches will not be squash-merged at release time.
  • Your code changes must meet the guidelines in CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • License: I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@github-actions
Copy link

  • This pull request modifies code in src/* but no tests were added/updated.
    • Confirm whether tests should be added or ensure the PR description explains why tests are not required.
  • This pull request implements a feat or fix, so it must include a changelog entry (unless the fix is for an unreleased feature). Review the changelog guidelines.
    • Note: beta or "experiment" features that have active users should announce fixes in the changelog.
    • If this is not a feature or fix, use an appropriate type from the title guidelines. For example, telemetry-only changes should use the telemetry type.

@jguoamz jguoamz changed the title fix(Chat): Add ToolUse to history even if input is missing fix(chat): Add ToolUse to history even if input is missing Apr 10, 2025
@jguoamz jguoamz closed this Apr 10, 2025
@jguoamz jguoamz reopened this Apr 10, 2025
@jguoamz jguoamz closed this Apr 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant