[Clang] Fix an assertion in expression recovery (llvm#112888)

Explicit object member function calls are not modelled as member calls

Fixes llvm#112559

Author: cor3ntin

clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst

@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ Improvements to Clang's diagnostics
 - The warning for an unsupported type for a named register variable is now phrased ``unsupported type for named register variable``,
   instead of ``bad type for named register variable``. This makes it clear that the type is not supported at all, rather than being
   suboptimal in some way the error fails to mention (#GH111550).
-  
+
 - Clang now emits a ``-Wdepredcated-literal-operator`` diagnostic, even if the
   name was a reserved name, which we improperly allowed to suppress the
   diagnostic.
@@ -538,6 +538,7 @@ Bug Fixes to C++ Support
   certain situations. (#GH47400), (#GH90896)
 - Fix erroneous templated array size calculation leading to crashes in generated code. (#GH41441)
 - During the lookup for a base class name, non-type names are ignored. (#GH16855)
+- Fix a crash when recovering an invalid expression involving an explicit object member conversion operator. (#GH112559)
 
 Bug Fixes to AST Handling
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

clang/lib/AST/Expr.cpp

@@ -1989,7 +1989,7 @@ Expr *CastExpr::getSubExprAsWritten() {
       SubExpr = IgnoreExprNodes(cast<CXXConstructExpr>(SubExpr)->getArg(0),
                                 ignoreImplicitSemaNodes);
     } else if (E->getCastKind() == CK_UserDefinedConversion) {
-      assert((isa<CXXMemberCallExpr>(SubExpr) || isa<BlockExpr>(SubExpr)) &&
+      assert((isa<CallExpr, BlockExpr>(SubExpr)) &&
              "Unexpected SubExpr for CK_UserDefinedConversion.");
       if (auto *MCE = dyn_cast<CXXMemberCallExpr>(SubExpr))
         SubExpr = MCE->getImplicitObjectArgument();

clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2b-deducing-this.cpp

@@ -1097,3 +1097,20 @@ struct C4 {
                                   // expected-warning {{volatile-qualified parameter type 'const volatile C4' is deprecated}}
 };
 }
+
+
+namespace GH112559 {
+struct Wrap  {};
+struct S {
+    constexpr operator Wrap (this const S& self) {
+        return Wrap{};
+    };
+    constexpr int operator <<(this Wrap self, int i) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+};
+// Purposefully invalid expression to check an assertion in the
+// expression recovery machinery.
+static_assert((S{} << 11) == a);
+// expected-error@-1 {{use of undeclared identifier 'a'}}
+}