Welcome to hacktribe Discussions! #22
Replies: 15 comments 12 replies
-
|
Thank you so much for this! It's amazing. I'm curious of the inner workings of the synth engine? Also have you found anything about the master compressor or master channel? I always hear compression? If this is coverd somewhere please direct me to further reading! Are you on Instagram? I'd love to pick your brain. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I haven't looked into the sound engine very far yet, only how the presets work for oscillators and FX. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi good work, I used the get-filehash command to display the actual checksums, and they are very different , but then again they would be, wouldn't they, given the code has been modified? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Before patching the firmware, sha256 hash of After patching the firmware, sha256 hash of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ah , I get it now . Thanks for that.
…Sent from my iPad
On 8 Jan 2022, at 11:56, bangcorrupt ***@***.***> wrote:
Before patching the firmware, sha256 hash of SYSTEM.VSB should match the hash in hash/SYSTEM.VSB.sha. This proves you have the correct version of the factory firmware.
After patching the firmware, sha256 hash of hacked-SYSTEM.VSB should match the hash in hash/hacked-SYSTEM.VSB. This proves you have the same modified firmware I have tested.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That’s weird it doesn’t , I am using the get-filehash command that displays the actual checksum, and they don’t match.
…Sent from my iPad
On 8 Jan 2022, at 11:56, bangcorrupt ***@***.***> wrote:
Before patching the firmware, sha256 hash of SYSTEM.VSB should match the hash in hash/SYSTEM.VSB.sha. This proves you have the correct version of the factory firmware.
After patching the firmware, sha256 hash of hacked-SYSTEM.VSB should match the hash in hash/hacked-SYSTEM.VSB. This proves you have the same modified firmware I have tested.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
They are different file sizes too
…Sent from my iPad
On 8 Jan 2022, at 11:56, bangcorrupt ***@***.***> wrote:
Before patching the firmware, sha256 hash of SYSTEM.VSB should match the hash in hash/SYSTEM.VSB.sha. This proves you have the correct version of the factory firmware.
After patching the firmware, sha256 hash of hacked-SYSTEM.VSB should match the hash in hash/hacked-SYSTEM.VSB. This proves you have the same modified firmware I have tested.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Can you paste the terminal output? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Attached picture
The two errors were caused by missing the .sha extension
Sent from my iPad
… On 8 Jan 2022, at 12:45, bangcorrupt ***@***.***> wrote:
Can you paste the terminal output?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
If you attached an image I can't see it. I don't think attachments will work through the github notification emails. Can you either copy and paste the text, or post a link to an image hosted elsewhere? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ok, I see what happened. Your first command In the next command |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
How do I see the hash of the hashed file?
Also I have compared the hash of the newly downloaded firmware and the same file which was download a couple of years ago , and they are different.
…Sent from my iPad
On 8 Jan 2022, at 13:14, bangcorrupt ***@***.***> wrote:
Ok, I see what happened. Your first command get-filehash hacked-SYSTEM.VSB is correct and shows the firmware has been modified correctly. The hash displayed matches the hash found in hash/hacked-SYSTEM.VSB.sha.
In the next command get-filehash hash\hacked-SYSTEM.VSB.sha you are computing a hash of the hash file. This is not necessary.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ah got it , notepad. Thanks for your help.
…Sent from my iPad
On 8 Jan 2022, at 13:14, bangcorrupt ***@***.***> wrote:
Ok, I see what happened. Your first command get-filehash hacked-SYSTEM.VSB is correct and shows the firmware has been modified correctly. The hash displayed matches the hash found in hash/hacked-SYSTEM.VSB.sha.
In the next command get-filehash hash\hacked-SYSTEM.VSB.sha you are computing a hash of the hash file. This is not necessary.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Once again thanks for the work you've done and your help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No problem at all. To avoid errors, don't load any samples to slots <501. This may change in the future but it's low priority. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I haven’t installed the hack yet , are the original sample names still visible? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No, the original samples are not loaded from the flash. If you have a factory sampler you can export the factory samples and load them into the user slots. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I’m sure I’ve got the original samples somewhere
…Sent from my iPad
On 8 Jan 2022, at 15:32, bangcorrupt ***@***.***> wrote:
No, the original samples are not loaded from the flash. If you have a factory sampler you can export the factory samples and load them into the user slots.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes I’ve got them as a .all. From hippy at 19. To shaker at 335
…Sent from my iPad
On 8 Jan 2022, at 15:32, bangcorrupt ***@***.***> wrote:
No, the original samples are not loaded from the flash. If you have a factory sampler you can export the factory samples and load them into the user slots.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
If you edit the .all so the first sample is in slot 501 they will load correctly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks , what are the sysex strings that currently work with the e2? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
See #37. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is posible to help with more exact information about the debrick procedure? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Answered in #66. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Just noticed the hacktribe is sampling at 48k, is that the normal sample rate for the unhacked sampler, or could that be the reason for the higher pitched sample bug? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think 48k is standard. Sample pitch bug is fixed in the latest commit. Which also appears to have fixed #4. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
👋 Welcome!
This is a place to ask questions, get help and discuss anything about hacktribe.
Please see the FAQ, read the Wiki and search discussions before posting a new thread, thank you.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions