Suggestion: Support XKB_KEY_* names instead of keycodes in bindings

[SorenHJohansen]

Currently, bindings rely on keycodes, for example:

bindd = SUPER, code:20, Expand window left, resizeactive, -100 0
bindd = SUPER, code:21, Shrink window left, resizeactive, 100 0

Would it be possible to support (or switch to) using XKB_KEY_* key names instead, like this:

bindd = SUPER, MINUS, Expand window left, resizeactive, -100 0
bindd = SUPER, EQUAL, Shrink window left, resizeactive, 100 0

Keycodes are highly layout-dependent.

On my Danish keyboard, code:20 does not map to -, so this keybind simply doesn’t work for me.

Using XKB key names would make bindings:

• Keyboard-layout independent
• More readable and self-documenting
• More portable across different locales

This would significantly improve usability for non-US keyboard layouts.