Skip to content

Rename approximator.summaries to summarize with deprecation #516

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2025
Merged

Rename approximator.summaries to summarize with deprecation #516

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2025

Conversation

@vpratz
Copy link
Collaborator

@vpratz vpratz commented Jun 17, 2025

As discussed in #510.

@vpratz vpratz requested a review from stefanradev93 June 17, 2025 13:09
@vpratz vpratz mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Merged
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
bayesflow/approximators/continuous_approximator.py 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...low/approximators/model_comparison_approximator.py 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...flow/diagnostics/metrics/model_misspecification.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
bayesflow/approximators/continuous_approximator.py 91.66% <60.00%> (-0.89%) ⬇️
...low/approximators/model_comparison_approximator.py 84.21% <60.00%> (-2.62%) ⬇️

... and 15 files with indirect coverage changes

@vpratz vpratz merged commit 057f3fd into dev Jun 17, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@vpratz vpratz deleted the rename-summaries branch June 17, 2025 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@stefanradev93 stefanradev93 Awaiting requested review from stefanradev93

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@vpratz