Update Issue template (#4258)

**What type of PR is this?**
Other

**What does this PR do? Why is it needed?**
It appears that the issue template is broken. The main reason for this
is a past change by GitHub, which now requires `ISSUE_TEMPLATE` to be a
folder instead of a file and uses yaml files instead of the original
markdown files.

Looks like PR template is working properly. 

ref:
https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/configuring-issue-templates-for-your-repository

**Which issues(s) does this PR fix?**

Fixes #

**Other notes for review**
None

Author: moisesvega

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+name: Issue
+description: New issue template
+body:
+  - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+    label: What version of rules_go are you using?
+    description: Check io_bazel_rules_go in WORKSPACE if you're not sure
+    validations:
+      required: true
+   - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+    label: What version of gazelle are you using?
+    description: Check bazel_gazelle in WORKSPACE if you're not sure
+    validations:
+      required: true
+   - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+    label: What version of Bazel are you using?
+    description: Run "bazel version" to find out
+    validations:
+      required: true
+   - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+    label: Does this issue reproduce with the latest releases of all the above?
+    validations:
+      required: true
+   - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+    label: What operating system and processor architecture are you using?
+    validations:
+      required: true
+   - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+    label: Any other potentially useful information about your toolchain?
+    description: C/C++ compiler, custom CROSSTOOL, remote execution?
+    validations:
+      required: false
+   - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+    label: What did you do?
+    description: If possible, provide a minimal recipe for reproducing the error.
+    validations:
+      required: false
+   - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+    label: What did you expect to see?
+    description:
+    validations:
+      required: false
+   - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+    label: What did you see instead?
+    description:
+    validations:
+      required: false